首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >The involvement of drugs in drivers of motor vehicles killed in Australian road traffic crashes.
【24h】

The involvement of drugs in drivers of motor vehicles killed in Australian road traffic crashes.

机译:毒品涉及在澳大利亚道路交通事故中丧生的机动车驾驶员。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A multi-center case-control study was conducted on 3398 fatally-injured drivers to assess the effect of alcohol and drug use on the likelihood of them being culpable. Crashes investigated were from three Australian states (Victoria, New South Wales and Western Australia). The control group of drug- and alcohol-free drivers comprised 50.1% of the study population. A previously validated method of responsibility analysis was used to classify drivers as either culpable or non-culpable. Cases in which the driver "contributed" to the crash (n=188) were excluded. Logistic regression was used to examine the association of key attributes such as age, gender, type of crash and drug use on the likelihood of culpability. Drivers positive to psychotropic drugs were significantly more likely to be culpable than drug-free drivers. Drivers with Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in their blood had a significantly higher likelihood of being culpable than drug-free drivers (odds ratio (OR) 2.7, 95% CI 1.02-7.0). For drivers with blood THC concentrations of 5ng/ml or higher the odds ratio was greater and more statistically significant (OR 6.6, 95% CI 1.5-28.0). The estimated odds ratio is greater than that for drivers with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.10-0.15% (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.1). A significantly stronger positive association with culpability was seen with drivers positive to THC and with BAC >/=0.05% compared with BAC >/=0.05 alone (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.7). Strong associations were also seen for stimulants, particularly in truck drivers. There were non-significant, weakly positive associations of opiates and benzodiazepines with culpability. Drivers positive to any psychoactive drug were significantly more likely to be culpable (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.4). Gender differences were not significant, but differences were apparent with age. Drivers showing the highest culpability rates were in the under 25 and over 65 age groups.
机译:对3398名致命伤害的驾驶员进行了多中心病例对照研究,以评估酗酒和吸毒对可能被肇事者的影响。调查的车祸来自澳大利亚的三个州(维多利亚州,新南威尔士州和西澳大利亚州)。无毒品和无酒精驾驶者的对照组占研究人口的50.1%。使用先前验证的责任分析方法将驱动程序分类为可归类或不可归类。排除了驾驶员“促成”车祸的情况(n = 188)。 Logistic回归用于检查关键属性的关联性,例如年龄,性别,失事类型和药物使用对犯罪的可能性。对精神药物呈阳性的驾驶员比无毒品的驾驶员更有可能被判罪。与不含毒品的驾驶员相比,血液中含有Delta(9)-四氢大麻酚(THC)的驾驶员有可能被判处明显更高的可能性(赔率(OR)为2.7,95%CI 1.02-7.0)。对于血液中THC浓度为5ng / ml或更高的驾驶员,比值比更大,并且在统计学上更为显着(OR 6.6,95%CI 1.5-28.0)。估计的优势比大于血液酒精浓度(BAC)为0.10-0.15%(OR 3.7,95%CI 1.5-9.1)的驾驶员。与单独使用BAC> / = 0.05相比,对THC阳性和BAC> / = 0.05%的驱动程序观察到了明显的与可抓性的正相关性(OR 2.9,95%CI 1.1-7.7)。人们还发现兴奋剂之间有很强的联系,特别是在卡车司机中。阿片类药物和苯二氮卓类药物的易感性无显着性,弱正相关性。对任何一种精神药物都呈阳性的驾驶员更有可能被判罪(OR 1.8,95%CI 1.3-2.4)。性别差异不明显,但随着年龄的增长差异明显。在25岁以下和65岁以上的年龄组中,表现出最高犯罪率的驾驶员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号