首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >Comparison of methods to correct the miscounting of multiple episodes of care when estimating the incidence of hospitalised injury in child motor vehicle passengers
【24h】

Comparison of methods to correct the miscounting of multiple episodes of care when estimating the incidence of hospitalised injury in child motor vehicle passengers

机译:在估计儿童机动车辆乘客住院伤害的发生率时纠正多种护理的错误计数方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study evaluates the performance of different case selection criteria to account for multiple episodes of care when estimating the hospitalisation rate due to road trauma amongst children. The internally linked NSW Inpatient Statistics Collection (ISC) dataset for the period between 1st July, 2000 and 30th June, 2003 was used to identify the "single" episode of care for each hospitalised child motor vehicle passenger residing in NSW. We used two hospitalised injury definitions of a case based on (1) all-diagnoses and (2) principal diagnosis only. We then developed case selection criteria, based on (a) linkage methods only available from linked ISC datasets; (b) selected variables available in both the linked and unlinked ISC datasets, to exclude repeat episodes of care for an injury. Changes in the estimated hospitalisation rate, and sensitivity and specificity, were calculated for each selection criteria compared to the findings from linkage methods as the "gold standard". None of the correction methods for multiple episodes of care was clearly superior in terms of incidence estimation, sensitivity, and specificity concurrently. However, the correction criterion which is optimal may vary depending on different study objectives and different types of hospitalised injuries.
机译:这项研究评估了不同病例选择标准的效果,以评估儿童因道路创伤而导致的住院率时的多次护理。使用内部链接的2000年7月1日至2003年6月30日之间的新南威尔士州住院患者统计数据集(ISC)来识别居住在新南威尔士州的每名住院儿童机动车辆乘客的“单次”护理。我们基于(1)全部诊断和(2)仅主要诊断的情况使用了两种住院伤害定义。然后,我们基于(a)仅可从链接的ISC数据集中获得的链接方法来开发案例选择标准。 (b)在链接的和未链接的ISC数据集中都可以选择的变量,以排除重复的伤害护理。将每种选择标准的估计住院率以及敏感性和特异性的变化与链接方法的发现进行比较,以此作为“黄金标准”。在发病率估计,敏感性和特异性方面,多种护理纠正方法均无明显优势。但是,最佳的校正标准可能会根据不同的研究目标和不同类型的住院伤害而有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号