...
首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >Personality domains and traits that predict self-reported aberrant driving behaviours in a southeastern US university sample
【24h】

Personality domains and traits that predict self-reported aberrant driving behaviours in a southeastern US university sample

机译:可以预测美国东南大学样本中自我报告的异常驾驶行为的人格领域和特征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Personality traits are meaningful predictors of many significant life outcomes, including mortality. Several studies have investigated the relationship between specific personality traits and driving behaviours, e.g., aggression and speeding, in an attempt to identify traits associated with elevated crash risk. These studies, while valuable, are limited in that they examine only a narrow range of personality constructs and thus do not necessarily reveal which traits in constellation best predict aberrant driving behaviours. The primary aim of this study was to use a comprehensive measure of personality to investigate which personality traits are most predictive of four types of aberrant driving behaviour (Aggressive Violations, Ordinary Violations, Errors, Lapses) as indicated by the Manchester Driver Behaviour Questionnaire (DBQ). We recruited 285 young adults (67% female) from a university in the southeastern US. They completed self-report questionnaires including the DBQ and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5, which indexes 5 broad personality domains (Antagonism, Detachment, Disinhibition, Negative Affectivity, Psychoticism) and 25 specific trait facets. Confirmatory factor analysis showed adequate evidence for the DBQ internal structure. Structural regression analyses revealed that the personality domains of Antagonism and Negative Affectivity best predicted both Aggressive Violations and Ordinary Violations, whereas the best predictors of both Errors and Lapses were Negative Affectivity, Disinhibition and to a lesser extent Antagonism. A more nuanced analysis of trait facets revealed that Hostility was the best predictor of Aggressive Violations; Risk-taking and Hostility of Ordinary Violations; Irresponsibility, Separation Insecurity and Attention Seeking of Errors; and Perseveration and Irresponsibility of Lapses.
机译:人格特质是许多重要生命结局(包括死亡率)的有意义的预测指标。几项研究已经研究了特定的人格特质与驾驶行为(例如攻击性和超速驾驶)之间的关系,以试图确定与高坠落风险相关的特征。这些研究虽然有价值,但局限性在于它们仅研究了狭窄范围的人格结构,因此不一定揭示星座中的哪些特征最能预测异常驾驶行为。这项研究的主要目的是使用一种全面的人格测度来调查哪些人格特征最能预测四种类型的异常驾驶行为(积极违规,普通违规,错误,失误),如曼彻斯特驾驶员行为问卷(DBQ)所表明的那样)。我们从美国东南部的一所大学招募了285名年轻人(女性占67%)。他们完成了自我报告调查问卷,包括DBQ和DSM-5的性格量表,其中包括5个广泛的性格领域(对抗性,分离性,抑制力,负面情感性,精神病性)和25个特定特征方面。验证性因素分析显示了DBQ内部结构的充分证据。结构回归分析显示,对抗性和负面情感的人格领域能最好地预测侵略性侵害和普通侵害,而错误和失误的最佳预测因素是负面情感性,抑制力和较小程度的对抗性。对特征方面进行更细致入微的分析后发现,敌对行为是侵略性侵害的最佳预测因子。普通违规行为的冒险和敌对行为;不负责任,分隔不安全和注意错误;和失败和不负责任的失败。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号