首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >Driver rehabilitation: A systematic review of the types and effectiveness of interventions used by occupational therapists to improve on-road fitness-to-drive
【24h】

Driver rehabilitation: A systematic review of the types and effectiveness of interventions used by occupational therapists to improve on-road fitness-to-drive

机译:驾驶员康复:对职业治疗师用来改善驾车健康状况的干预措施的类型和有效性的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: Driver rehabilitation has the potential to improve on-road safety and is commonly recommended to clients. The aim of this systematic review was to identify what intervention approaches are used by occupational therapists as part of driver rehabilitation programmes, and to determine the effectiveness of these interventions. Method: Six electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and OTD-Base) were searched. Two authors independently reviewed studies reporting all types of research designs and for all patient populations, provided the interventions could be administered by occupational therapists. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the 'Downs and Black Instrument', and the level of evidence for each intervention approach was established using 'Centre for Evidence Based Medicine' criteria. Results: Sixteen studies were included in the review. The most common type of intervention approach used was computer-based driving simulator training (n = 8), followed by off-road skill-specific training (n = 4), and off-road education programmes (n = 3). Car adaptations/modifications were used in one of the included studies. There was significant variability between studies with regards to frequency, duration, and total number of intervention sessions, and the diagnoses of the participants. Of the four intervention approaches, there is evidence to support the effectiveness of off-road skill-specific training (with older clients), and computer-based driving simulator training (with both older clients and participants with acquired brain injury). Conclusion: Three types of intervention approaches are commonly reported, however, there is limited evidence to determine to effectiveness of these in improving fitness-to-drive. Further research is required, with clients from a range of diagnostic groups to establish evidence-based interventions and determine their effectiveness in improving these clients' on-road fitness-to-drive.
机译:目标:驾驶员康复有可能改善道路安全,通常推荐给客户。这项系统审查的目的是确定职业治疗师将哪些干预方法用作驾驶员康复计划的一部分,并确定这些干预措施的有效性。方法:搜索六个电子数据库(MEDLINE,CINAHL,PsycInfo,Embase,Cochrane库和OTD-Base)。两位作者独立审查了报告,报告了所有类型的研究设计,并针对所有患者群体,条件是干预措施可由职业治疗师进行管理。研究的方法学质量使用“ Downs and Black Instrument”进行评估,每种干预方法的证据水平均使用“循证医学中心”标准进行确定。结果:16项研究被纳入评价。最常用的干预方法是基于计算机的驾驶模拟器培训(n = 8),然后是越野技能特定培训(n = 4)和越野教育计划(n = 3)。在其中一项研究中,对汽车进行了改装。在研究的频率,持续时间,干预次数,参与者的诊断方面,研究之间存在显着差异。在这四种干预方法中,有证据支持针对越野技能的培训(针对老年客户)和基于计算机的驾驶模拟器培训(针对老年客户和患有后天性脑损伤的参与者)的有效性。结论:普遍报道了三种类型的干预方法,但是,确定这些方法在提高驾驶适应性方面的有效性的证据有限。需要进一步的研究,与来自多个诊断小组的客户建立基于证据的干预措施,并确定其在改善这些客户的行车适应性方面的有效性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Accident Analysis & Prevention》 |2014年第10期|106-114|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne 3086, VIC, Australia,Department of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Joenkoeping University, Joenkoeping, Sweden,La Trobe University, Occupational Therapy, Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora 3086, VIC, Australia;

    Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne 3086, VIC, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Driver intervention; Driver rehabilitation; Fitness-to-drive; On-road; Systematic review;

    机译:驾驶员干预;驾驶员康复;适合驾驶;在路上;系统评价;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:19:41

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号