...
首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >Bicycle-vehicle interactions at mid-sections of mixed traffic streets: Examining passing distance and bicycle comfort perception
【24h】

Bicycle-vehicle interactions at mid-sections of mixed traffic streets: Examining passing distance and bicycle comfort perception

机译:混合交通街道中段的自行车与车辆的交互:检查通过距离和自行车舒适感

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper studies the relevant factors in mixed urban traffic that may impact the lateral spacing between bicycles and vehicles (passing distance, PD), and their resulting effect on a bicyclists' comfort based on a study of six sites in Ottawa, Canada. The observations are: [i] the average position of bicycles from the curb is 0.57 m, and lesser (Le. 0.35 m) in the presence of parking; [ii] 90% of passes exceed 1.23 m; [iii] PD is positively correlated with motor vehicle speed, lane width, and bicycle position from adjacent curb edge line, whiles inversely correlated to ambient traffic density and bicycle speed; [iv] motor vehicle speed has the highest prediction of PD variability; [v] PD and ambient traffic density (ATD) are found to be the most important factors to a bicyclists' comfort perception (BCP). Two linear regression models for PD and BCP were developed and significant variables are identified as: motor vehicle speed, bicycle speed, ATD, number of lanes, and lane width. The presence or absence of a grade slope is found to be significant to the PD model and not to BCP. The models both exhibit limited predictive ability, however residual plots and significance of included variables are indicative of correct assumptions for the models. It is recommended that speed calming, sharrows, road signs instructing road sharing, and educating road users against "dooring" crashes be considered in improving road sharing, especially for narrow lanes (i.e. less than 3.6 m) and lanes wider than 4.5 m. It is also prudent for designers to avoid installing parking zones on narrow shared roads.
机译:本文基于加拿大渥太华的六个地点的研究,研究了混合城市交通中可能影响自行车和车辆之间横向距离(通过距离,PD)的相关因素,以及它们对骑车人的舒适性的影响。观察结果是:[i]在路边停车时自行车的平均位置为0.57 m,在有停车位的情况下较小(0.35 m来); [ii] 90%的通道超过1.23 m; [iii] PD与机动车速度,车道宽度和相邻路缘边缘线处的自行车位置呈正相关,而与环境交通密度和自行车速度则呈负相关; [iv]机动车速度具有最高的PD变异性预测; [v] PD和环境交通密度(ATD)被发现是骑车人的舒适感(BCP)的最重要因素。建立了PD和BCP的两个线性回归模型,并确定了重要变量:机动车速度,自行车速度,ATD,车道数和车道宽度。发现坡度的存在或不存在对PD模型而不是对BCP有意义。这些模型均显示出有限的预测能力,但是残差图和所包含变量的显着性指示了该模型的正确假设。建议在改善道路共享时,特别是对于狭窄车道(即小于3.6 m)和宽于4.5 m的车道,应考虑速度平缓,狭窄,指示道路共享的路标以及对道路使用者进行“门”撞事故的教育。设计师也应避免在狭窄的共享道路上安装停车区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号