首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >Adaptive forward collision warnings: The impact of imperfect technology on behavioral adaptation, warning effectiveness and acceptance
【24h】

Adaptive forward collision warnings: The impact of imperfect technology on behavioral adaptation, warning effectiveness and acceptance

机译:自适应向前碰撞警告:不完善的技术对行为适应,警告有效性和接受度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Adaptive ADAS that adjust warnings according to the driver's current need for support offer a great potential to increase safety. However, it is crucial to understand how drivers deal with dynamically adapting technologies particularly in situations in which driver state monitoring fails and the system shows unexpected behavior. To better understand the consequences of unreliable adaptive ADAS on safety and to assess how failures of an adaptive FCW influence driving behavior, we conducted a driving simulator study with N = 48 participants. Participants experienced critical brake events in situations with and without a distracting secondary task. An adaptive FCW provided visual warnings to undistracted drivers but highly supportive visuo-haptic warnings (brake jerks or vibration) to distracted drivers. In 20% of brake events, however, the system unexpectedly provided incorrectly adapted warnings in which the combination of warning type and distraction was reversed. This adaptive FCW was compared to a non-adaptive standard FCW that provided visual warnings only. We found that incorrect warnings impaired driver reactions and safety in distracted drivers, and these adverse behavioral effects had two sources: (1) Violations of the drivers' expectancies about the warning, and hence, behavioral adaptation. (2) The absence of the compensatory effect of the highly supportive warning in case of distraction. In contrast, correctly adapted warnings reduced decrements in brake reaction times and fully offset safety deficits associated with driver distraction. Crucially, however, an effectiveness evaluation of the adaptive system's potential to support drivers when correct warnings were elicited failed to demonstrate a benefit of the adaptive FCW over the non-adaptive FCW. Our results thus emphasize that a high reliability is crucial for adaptive ADAS to improve safety and to prevent adverse effects due to behavioral adaptation.
机译:根据驾驶员当前的支持需求调整警告的自适应ADAS具有提高安全性的巨大潜力。但是,至关重要的是要了解驱动程序如何处理动态适应的技术,尤其是在驱动程序状态监视失败且系统显示意外行为的情况下。为了更好地理解不可靠的自适应ADAS对安全性的影响并评估自适应FCW的故障如何影响驾驶行为,我们进行了N = 48位参与者的驾驶模拟器研究。在有或没有分心的次要任务的情况下,参与者都经历了严重的刹车事件。自适应FCW向分散注意力的驾驶员提供视觉警告,但向分散注意力的驾驶员提供高度支持的视觉触觉警告(刹车震动或振动)。但是,在20%的制动事件中,系统意外地提供了错误匹配的警告,其中警告类型和分散注意力的组合被颠倒了。将此自适应FCW与仅提供视觉警告的非自适应标准FCW进行了比较。我们发现不正确的警告会损害分心的驾驶员的反应和安全性,这些不良的行为影响有两个来源:(1)违反驾驶员对警告的期望,从而导致行为适应。 (2)在分心的情况下,没有高度支持警告的补偿作用。相反,正确调整的警告会减少制动反应时间的减少,并完全抵消与驾驶员分心有关的安全缺陷。然而,至关重要的是,当引发正确警告时,对自适应系统对驾驶员的支持潜力的有效性评估未能证明自适应FCW优于非自适应FCW的好处。因此,我们的结果强调,高可靠性对于自适应ADAS提高安全性并防止由于行为适应引起的不利影响至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号