The Construction and Contributions of 'Implications for Practice': What's in Them and What Might They Offer?

摘要

"Most reviewers' checklists of leading management journals list the criterion, "relevance for practice." Authors comply with this criterion by pointing out what implications their results might have for practice. Evidence in the form of successful implementations of the results in practice is not required. Essentially, the authors are only supposed to point out what implications practitioners, as they socially construct them, can possibly draw from their results. If the reviewers' construction of relevance is in accordance with the author's, the criterion of relevance has been met ..." (Kieser & Leiner, 2009: 522-523; italics in original).