首页> 外文期刊>Academic Emergency Medicine >Simulation Center Accreditation and Programmatic Benchmarks: A Review for Emergency Medicine
【24h】

Simulation Center Accreditation and Programmatic Benchmarks: A Review for Emergency Medicine

机译:模拟中心认证和计划基准:急诊医学评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Simulation-based education has grown significantly over the past 10 years. As a result, more professional organizations are developing or implementing accreditation processes to help define minimum standards and best practices in simulation-based training. However, the benefits and potential pitfalls of sponsoring and implementing such programs have yet to be fully evaluated across specialties. The board of directors of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) requested an evaluation of the potential to create an emergency medicine (EM)-based Simulation Consultation and Accreditation Service. In response to this request, the Simulation Accreditation and Consultation Work Group, a subgroup of the Committee on Technology in Medical Education (now Simulation Academy), was created. The work group was charged with: 1) reviewing current benchmarks and standards set by existing simulation accreditation programs; 2) analyzing current EM simulation program structures, including leadership, administrative, and financial components; and 3) proposing a potential model for EM-based simulation accreditation. This article outlines currently existing and proposed accreditation models and identifies components that support best practices. It then goes on to describe three general programmatic models to better understand how simulation training can be operationalized in EM. Finally, the work group uses this collective information to propose how an accreditation process, in concert with the SAEM Simulation Consultation Service, can enhance and advance EM simulation training.ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:1093–1103 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
机译:在过去的十年中,基于模拟的教育取得了显着增长。结果,更多的专业组织正在开发或实施认证流程,以帮助定义基于模拟的培训的最低标准和最佳实践。但是,发起和实施此类计划的好处和潜在弊端尚未在各个专业领域得到充分评估。学术急诊医学协会(SAEM)的董事会要求对创建基于急诊医学(EM)的模拟咨询和鉴定服务的潜力进行评估。为响应此请求,创建了医学认证技术委员会(现为模拟学院)的子小组模拟认证和咨询工作组。工作组负责:1)审查现有的模拟认证计划设定的当前基准和标准; 2)分析当前的EM模拟计划结构,包括领导,行政和财务组成部分; 3)提出了基于EM的模拟认证的潜在模型。本文概述了现有的和建议的认证模型,并确定了支持最佳实践的组件。然后,它继续描述了三个通用程序模型,以更好地理解如何在EM中进行模拟训练。最后,工作组使用这些集体信息来提出认证过程,以及与SAEM模拟咨询服务的配合,如何增强和推进EM模拟培训。ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:1093-13-1103©2010年学术急诊医学协会

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号