首页> 外文期刊>Academic Emergency Medicine >Cricothyrotomy Technique Using Gum Elastic Bougie Is Faster Than Standard Technique: A Study of Emergency Medicine Residents and Medical Students in an Animal Lab
【24h】

Cricothyrotomy Technique Using Gum Elastic Bougie Is Faster Than Standard Technique: A Study of Emergency Medicine Residents and Medical Students in an Animal Lab

机译:使用口香糖弹力Bougie进行环切开术技术比标准技术快:在动物实验室中对急诊医学居民和医学生的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: The objective was to compare time to completion, failure rate, and subjective difficulty of a new cricothyrotomy technique to the standard technique. The new bougie-assisted cricothyrotomy technique (BACT) is similar to the rapid four-step technique (RFST), but a bougie and endotracheal tube are inserted rather than a Shiley tracheostomy tube.Methods: This was a randomized controlled trail conducted on domestic sheep. During a 3-month period inexperienced residents or students were randomized to perform cricothyrotomy on anesthetized sheep using either the standard technique or the BACT. Operators were trained with an educational video before the procedure. Time to successful cricothyrotomy was recorded. The resident or student was then asked to rate the difficulty of the procedure on a five-point scale from 1 (very easy) to 5 (very difficult).Results: Twenty-one residents and students were included in the study: 11 in the standard group and 10 in the BACT group. Compared to the standard technique, the BACT was significantly faster with a median time of 67 seconds (interquartile range [IQR] = 55–82) versus 149 seconds (IQR = 111–201) for the standard technique (p = 0.002). The BACT was also rated easier to perform (median = 2, IQR = 1–3) than the standard technique (median = 3, IQR = 2–4; p = 0.04). The failure rate was 1/10 for the BACT compared to 3/11 for the standard method (p = NS).Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the BACT is faster than the standard technique and has a similar failure rate when performed by inexperienced providers on anesthetized sheep.ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:666–669 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
机译:目的:目的是比较一种新的环颈椎切开术技术与标准技术的完成时间,失败率和主观难度。新的布吉氏辅助环切开胸术(BACT)与快速四步法(RFST)类似,但插入布吉氏和气管插管而不是Shiley气管造口术。方法:这是对家养绵羊进行的随机对照试验。在3个月的时间内,将经验不足的居民或学生随机分组,使用标准技术或BACT对麻醉过的绵羊进行环切开孔术。手术前,操作员接受了教育视频培训。记录成功开胸手术的时间。然后要求居民或学生从1(非常容易)到5(非常困难)的5分制对程序的难度进行评分。结果:21名居民和学生被纳入研究:11名居民和学生标准组和BACT组中的10组。与标准技术相比,BACT的平均速度显着更快,中位时间为67秒(四分位间距[IQR] = 55-82),而标准技术的中位时间为149秒(IQR = 111-201)(p = 0.002)。与标准技术(中位数= 3,IQR = 2-4; p = 0.04)相比,BACT的执行更容易(中位数= 2,IQR = 1-3)。 BACT的故障率为1/10,而标准方法为3/11(p = NS)。结论:这项研究表明,BACT的速度比标准技术快,并且由经验不足的提供者执行时具有相似的故障率在麻醉的绵羊上。《急诊医学杂志》 2010; 17:666–669©2010,学术急诊医学协会

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号