首页> 外文期刊>Academic Emergency Medicine >Can Computed Tomography Angiography of the Brain Replace Lumbar Puncture in the Evaluation of Acute-onset Headache After a Negative Noncontrast Cranial Computed Tomography Scan?
【24h】

Can Computed Tomography Angiography of the Brain Replace Lumbar Puncture in the Evaluation of Acute-onset Headache After a Negative Noncontrast Cranial Computed Tomography Scan?

机译:可否通过脑部CT血管造影术替代阴性的颅脑CT扫描来评估急性发作性头痛时的腰椎穿刺吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: The primary goal of evaluation for acute-onset headache is to exclude aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Noncontrast cranial computed tomography (CT), followed by lumbar puncture (LP) if the CT is negative, is the current standard of care. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the brain has become more available and more sensitive for the detection of cerebral aneurysms. This study addresses the role of CT/CTA versus CT/LP in the diagnostic workup of acute-onset headache.Methods: This article reviews the recent literature for the prevalence of SAH in emergency department (ED) headache patients, the sensitivity of CT for diagnosing acute SAH, and the sensitivity and specificity of CTA for cerebral aneurysms. An equivalence study comparing CT/LP and CT/CTA would require 3,000 +  subjects. As an alternative, the authors constructed a mathematical probability model to determine the posttest probability of excluding aneurysmal or arterial venous malformation (AVM) SAH with a CT/CTA strategy.Results: SAH prevalence in ED headache patients was conservatively estimated at 15%. Representative studies reported CT sensitivity for SAH to be 91% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 82% to 97%) and sensitivity of CTA for aneurysm to be 97.9% (95% CI = 88.9% to 99.9%). Based on these data, the posttest probability of excluding aneurysmal SAH after a negative CT/CTA was 99.43% (95% CI = 98.86% to 99.81%).Conclusions: CT followed by CTA can exclude SAH with a greater than 99% posttest probability. In ED patients complaining of acute-onset headache without significant SAH risk factors, CT/CTA may offer a less invasive and more specific diagnostic paradigm. If one chooses to offer LP after CT/CTA, informed consent for LP should put the pretest risk of a missed aneurysmal SAH at less than 1%.ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:444–451 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
机译:目的:评估急性发作性头痛的主要目标是排除动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)。当前的标准是无创颅骨计算机断层扫描(CT),如果CT阴性,然后进行腰穿(LP)。大脑的计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)对于检测脑动脉瘤变得更加可用和敏感。本研究探讨了CT / CTA与CT / LP在急性发作性头痛诊断中的作用。方法:本文综述了有关急诊科(ED)头痛患者SAH患病率的最新文献,CT对CHA的敏感性诊断急性SAH,以及CTA对脑动脉瘤的敏感性和特异性。比较CT / LP和CT / CTA的等效研究需要3,000余名受试者。作为替代方案,作者构建了数学概率模型来确定采用CT / CTA策略排除动脉瘤或动脉静脉畸形(AVM)SAH的事后概率。结果:ED头痛患者的SAH患病率保守估计为15%。代表性研究报告说,SAH的CT敏感性为91%(95%置信区间[CI] = 82%至97%),而CTA对动脉瘤的敏感性为97.9%(95%CI = 88.9%至99.9%)。根据这些数据,CT / CTA阴性后排除动脉瘤SAH的事后检验概率为99.43%(95%CI = 98.86%至99.81%)。结论:CT + CTA可以排除事后概率大于99%的SAH。 。在主诉急性发作性头痛而无明显SAH危险因素的ED患者中,CT / CTA可能提供侵入性更小,更具体的诊断范例。如果选择在CT / CTA之后提供LP,则LP的知情同意应将漏诊的动脉瘤SAH的前测风险控制在1%以下。ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:444–451©2010年学术急诊医学协会

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号