首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >Comparative field study evaluating the activity of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein in plasma samples at clinical haemostasis laboratories
【2h】

Comparative field study evaluating the activity of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein in plasma samples at clinical haemostasis laboratories

机译:在临床止血实验室评估血浆样本中重组VIII因子Fc融合蛋白活性的比较现场研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Discrepancies exist for some of the modified coagulation factors when assayed with different one-stage clotting and chromogenic substrate assay reagents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc), currently in clinical development for the treatment of severe haemophilia A, in a variety of one-stage clotting and chromogenic substrate assays in clinical haemostasis laboratories. Haemophilic plasma samples spiked with rFVIIIFc or Advate® at 0.05, 0.20 or 0.80 IU mL−1 were tested by 30 laboratories using their routine procedures and plasma standards. Data were evaluated for intra- and inter-laboratory variation, accuracy and possible rFVIIIFc-specific assay discrepancies. For the one-stage assay, mean recovery was 95% to 100% of expected for both Advate® and rFVIIIFc at 0.8 IU mL−1. Intra-laboratory percent coefficient of variance (CV) ranged from 6.3% to 7.8% for Advate®, and 6.0% to 10.3% for rFVIIIFc. Inter-laboratory CV ranged from 10% for Advate® and 16% for rFVIIIFc at 0.8 IU mL−1, to over 30% at 0.05 IU mL−1 for both products. For the chromogenic substrate assay, the average FVIII recovery was 107% ± 5% and 124% ± 8% of label potency across the three concentrations of Advate® and rFVIIIFc, respectively. Plasma rFVIIIFc levels can be monitored by either the one-stage or the chromogenic substrate assay routinely performed in clinical laboratories without the need for a product-specific rFVIIIFc laboratory standard. Accuracy by the one-stage assay was comparable to that of Advate®, while marginally higher results may be observed for rFVIIIFc when using the chromogenic assay.
机译:当使用不同的一阶段凝血和生色底物测定试剂进行测定时,某些修饰的凝血因子存在差异。这项研究的目的是在临床止血实验室中的各种一阶段凝血和生色底物测定中评估重组VIII因子Fc融合蛋白(rFVIIIFc)的性能,该蛋白目前正在临床开发中,用于治疗严重的A型血友病。 。 30个实验室使用常规程序和血浆标准对掺有0.05、0.20或0.80 IUmL -1 的rFVIIIFc或Advate®的血友病血浆样品进行了测试。评估数据的实验室内和实验室间差异,准确性和可能的​​rFVIIIFc特异性测定差异。对于一阶段分析,Advate®和rFVIIIFc在0.8IU mL -1 时的平均回收率为预期的95%至100%。 Advate®的实验室内变异系数百分比(CV)为6.3%至7.8%,而rFVIIIFc则为6.0%至10.3%。实验室间CV范围从Advate®的10%和rFVIIIFc的16%在0.8IUmL -1 到两种产品在0.05IUmL -1 的30%以上不等。对于生色底物测定,在Advate®和rFVIIIFc的三个浓度下,平均FVIII回收率分别是标记效力的107%±5%和124%±8%。血浆rFVIIIFc的水平可以通过临床实验室中常规进行的一阶段或生色底物分析进行监测,而无需特定于产品的rFVIIIFc实验室标准。一步测定的准确性与Advate®相当,而使用发色测定时,rFVIIIFc的结果可能略高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号