首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >Testing predictions of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis: a meta-analysis of experimental evidence for distance- and density-dependent seed and seedling survival
【2h】

Testing predictions of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis: a meta-analysis of experimental evidence for distance- and density-dependent seed and seedling survival

机译:Janzen-Connell假说的测试预测:对距离和密度依赖的种子和幼苗存活的实验证据的荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

class="enumerated" style="list-style-type:decimal">The Janzen–Connell hypothesis proposes that specialist natural enemies, such as herbivores and pathogens, maintain diversity in plant communities by reducing survival rates of conspecific seeds and seedlings located close to reproductive adults or in areas of high conspecific density. Variation in the strength of distance- and density-dependent effects is hypothesized to explain variation in plant species richness along climatic gradients, with effects predicted to be stronger in the tropics than the temperate zone and in wetter habitats compared to drier habitats.We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify peer-reviewed experimental studies published in the 40+ years since the hypothesis was first proposed. Using data from these studies, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the current weight of evidence for the distance and density predictions of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis.Overall, we found significant support for both the distance- and density-dependent predictions. For all studies combined, survival rates were significantly reduced near conspecifics compared to far from conspecifics, and in areas with high densities of conspecifics compared to areas with low conspecific densities. There was no indication that these results were due to publication bias.The strength of distance and density effects varied widely among studies. Contrary to expectations, this variation was unrelated to latitude, and there was no significant effect of study region. However, we did find a trend for stronger distance and density dependence in wetter sites compared to sites with lower annual precipitation. In addition, effects were significantly stronger at the seedling stage compared to the seed stage.Synthesis. Our study provides support for the idea that distance- and density-dependent mortality occurs in plant communities world-wide. Available evidence suggests that natural enemies are frequently the cause of such patterns, consistent with the Janzen–Connell hypothesis, but additional studies are needed to rule out other mechanisms (e.g. intraspecific competition). With the widespread existence of density and distance dependence clearly established, future research should focus on assessing the degree to which these effects permit species coexistence and contribute to the maintenance of diversity in plant communities.
机译:class =“ enumerated” style =“ list-style-type:decimal”> <!-list-behavior =枚举前缀-word = mark-type = decimal max-label-size = 0-> Janzen-Connell假说提出,食草动物和病原体等专门的天敌通过降低靠近成年成虫或高同种密度区域的同种种子和幼苗的存活率,来维持植物群落的多样性。假设距离和密度依赖性作用强度的变化可以解释植物物种丰富度随气候梯度的变化,与热带地区相比,热带地区的影响要强于温带地区和潮湿的栖息地。 我们进行了全面的文献搜索,以找出自从首次提出该假设以来40年来发表的经过同行评审的实验研究。利用这些研究的数据,我们进行了荟萃分析,评估了有关Janzen-Connell假设的距离和密度预测的当前证据权重。 总体而言,我们发现距离-和密度相关的预测。对于所有组合研究,与远离特定物种的情况相比,靠近特定物种的生存率显着降低;与较低特定物种密度的区域相比,在较高特定物种密度的区域中,生存率显着降低。没有迹象表明这些结果是由于出版物的偏见。 距离的强度和密度效应在研究之间差异很大。与期望相反,这种变化与纬度无关,并且对研究区域没有显着影响。但是,我们确实发现,与年降水量较低的地区相比,湿润地区的距离和密度依赖性更强。此外,与种子期相比,苗期的效果要强得多。 合成。我们的研究为世界范围内植物群落中依赖于距离和密度的死亡率发生这一观点提供了支持。现有证据表明,天敌通常是造成这种模式的原因,这与Janzen-Connell假说是​​一致的,但是还需要进一步研究以排除其他机制(例如种内竞争)。随着密度和距离依赖性的广泛存在已得到明确确立,未来的研究应集中于评估这些效应允许物种共存并有助于维持植物群落多样性的程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号