首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >Developing a Bayesian adaptive design for a phase I clinical trial: a case study for a novel HIV treatment
【2h】

Developing a Bayesian adaptive design for a phase I clinical trial: a case study for a novel HIV treatment

机译:为I期临床试验开发贝叶斯自适应设计:一种新型HIV治疗的案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The design of phase I studies is often challenging, because of limited evidence to inform study protocols. Adaptive designs are now well established in cancer but much less so in other clinical areas. A phase I study to assess the safety, pharmacokinetic profile and antiretroviral efficacy of C34‐PEG4‐Chol, a novel peptide fusion inhibitor for the treatment of HIV infection, has been set up with Medical Research Council funding. During the study workup, Bayesian adaptive designs based on the continual reassessment method were compared with a more standard rule‐based design, with the aim of choosing a design that would maximise the scientific information gained from the study. The process of specifying and evaluating the design options was time consuming and required the active involvement of all members of the trial's protocol development team. However, the effort was worthwhile as the originally proposed rule‐based design has been replaced by a more efficient Bayesian adaptive design. While the outcome to be modelled, design details and evaluation criteria are trial specific, the principles behind their selection are general. This case study illustrates the steps required to establish a design in a novel context. © 2016 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
机译:由于提供研究方案的证据有限,因此一期研究的设计通常具有挑战性。适应性设计现已在癌症中确立,但在其他临床领域则很少。在医学研究理事会的资助下,已建立了一项第一阶段研究,以评估C34-PEG4-Chol(一种用于治疗HIV感染的新型肽融合抑制剂)的安全性,药代动力学特征和抗逆转录病毒疗效。在研究工作期间,将基于持续重新评估方法的贝叶斯自适应设计与更标准的基于规则的设计进行了比较,目的是选择一种能够最大化从研究中获得的科学信息的设计。指定和评估设计方案的过程非常耗时,需要试验方案开发团队的所有成员积极参与。但是,这是值得的,因为最初提出的基于规则的设计已被更有效的贝叶斯自适应设计所代替。尽管要建模的结果,设计细节和评估标准是针对特定试验的,但其选择背后的原则却是通用的。本案例研究说明了在新颖的环境中建立设计所需的步骤。 ©2016作者。 John Wiley&Sons Ltd发布的医学统计学

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号