首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >Authentication of M14 melanoma cell line proves misidentification of MDA‐MB‐435 breast cancer cell line
【2h】

Authentication of M14 melanoma cell line proves misidentification of MDA‐MB‐435 breast cancer cell line

机译:M14黑色素瘤细胞系的鉴定证明了MDA‐MB‐435乳腺癌细胞系的错误识别

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A variety of analytical approaches have indicated that melanoma cell line UCLA‐SO‐M14 (M14) and breast carcinoma cell line MDA‐MB‐435 originate from a common donor. This indicates that at some point in the past, one of these cell lines became misidentified, meaning that it ceased to correspond to the reported donor and instead became falsely identified (through cross‐contamination or other means) as a cell line from a different donor. Initial studies concluded that MDA‐MB‐435 was the misidentified cell line and M14 was the authentic cell line, although contradictory evidence has been published, resulting in further confusion. To address this question, we obtained early samples of the melanoma cell line (M14), a lymphoblastoid cell line from the same donor (ML14), and donor serum preserved at the originator's institution. M14 samples were cryopreserved in December 1975, before MDA‐MB‐435 cells were established in culture. Through a series of molecular characterizations, including short tandem repeat (STR) profiling and cytogenetic analysis, we demonstrated that later samples of M14 and MDA‐MB‐435 correspond to samples of M14 frozen in 1975, to the lymphoblastoid cell line ML14, and to the melanoma donor's STR profile, sex and blood type. This work demonstrates conclusively that M14 is the authentic cell line and MDA‐MB‐435 is misidentified. With clear provenance information and authentication testing of early samples, it is possible to resolve debates regarding the origins of problematic cell lines that are widely used in cancer research.
机译:多种分析方法表明,黑色素瘤细胞系UCLA-SO-M14(M14)和乳腺癌细胞系MDA-MB-435来自共同的供体。这表明在过去的某个时候,这些细胞系之一被错误识别,这意味着它不再对应于所报道的供体,而是被错误地识别(通过交叉污染或其他方式)为来自其他供体的细胞系。 。初步研究得出的结论是,虽然已经发布了相互矛盾的证据,但MDA-MB-435是错误识别的细胞系,M14是真实的细胞系,导致了进一步的混乱。为了解决这个问题,我们获得了黑色素瘤细胞系(M14),来自同一供体(ML14)的淋巴母细胞系的早期样本,并在原始机构保留了供体血清。在培养中建立MDA-MB-435细胞之前,M14样品于1975年12月冷冻保存。通过一系列分子表征,包括短串联重复序列(STR)分析和细胞遗传学分析,我们证明M14和MDA-MB-435的后续样品对应于1975年冷冻的M14样品,对应于淋巴母细胞样细胞系ML14,以及黑色素瘤供体的STR概况,性别和血型。这项工作最终证明M14是真实的细胞系,而MDA-MB-435是错误的。通过清晰的出处信息和早期样品的鉴定测试,有可能解决关于癌症研究中广泛使用的有问题细胞系起源的争论。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号