首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Toxicological Research >Receptor Binding Affinities of Synthetic Cannabinoids Determined by Non-Isotopic Receptor Binding Assay
【2h】

Receptor Binding Affinities of Synthetic Cannabinoids Determined by Non-Isotopic Receptor Binding Assay

机译:通过非同位素受体结合测定法测定合成大麻素的受体结合亲和力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A major predictor of the efficacy of natural or synthetic cannabinoids is their binding affinity to the cannabinoid type I receptor (CB1) in the central nervous system, as the main psychological effects of cannabinoids are achieved via binding to this receptor. Conventionally, receptor binding assays have been performed using isotopes, which are inconvenient owing to the effects of radioactivity. In the present study, the binding affinities of five cannabinoids for purified CB1 were measured using a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) technique as a putative non-isotopic receptor binding assay. Results were compared with those of a radio-isotope-labeled receptor binding assay. The representative natural cannabinoid Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and four synthetic cannabinoids, JWH-015, JWH-210, RCS-4, and JWH-250, were assessed using both the SPR biosensor assay and the conventional isotopic receptor binding assay. The binding affinities of the test substances to CB1 were determined to be (from highest to lowest) 9.52 × 10−13 M (JWH-210), 6.54 × 10−12 M (JWH-250), 1.56 × 10−11 M (Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol), 2.75 × 10−11 M (RCS-4), and 6.80 ×10−11 M (JWH-015) using the non-isotopic method. Using the conventional isotopic receptor binding assay, the same order of affinities was observed. In conclusion, our results support the use of kinetic analysis via SPR in place of the isotopic receptor binding assay. To replace the receptor binding affinity assay with SPR techniques in routine assays, further studies for method validation will be needed in the future.
机译:天然或合成大麻素功效的主要预测指标是它们与中枢神经系统中I类大麻素受体(CB1)的结合亲和力,因为大麻素的主要心理作用是通过与该受体结合而实现的。常规地,已经使用同位素进行了受体结合测定,由于放射性的影响,这是不方便的。在本研究中,使用表面等离子体共振(SPR)技术作为推定的非同位素受体结合测定法测量了5种大麻素对纯化CB1的结合亲和力。将结果与放射性同位素标记的受体结合测定的结果进行比较。代表性的天然大麻素Δ 9 -四氢大麻酚和四种合成大麻素JWH-015,JWH-210,RCS-4和JWH-250均使用SPR生物传感器测定法和常规同位素受体进行了评估结合测定。确定测试物质与CB1的结合亲和力(从最高到最低)为9.52×10 -13 M(JWH-210),6.54×10 -12 M(JWH-250),1.56×10 −11 M(Δ 9 -四氢大麻酚),2.75×10 −11 M(RCS- 4)和6.80×10 −11 M(JWH-015)使用非同位素方法。使用常规的同位素受体结合测定法,观察到相同顺序的亲和力。总之,我们的结果支持通过SPR进行动力学分析来代替同位素受体结合测定。为了在常规测定中用SPR技术取代受体结合亲和力测定,将来需要对方法验证进行进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号