首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Taylor Francis Open Select >Representations of palliative care euthanasia and assisted dying within advocacy declarations
【2h】

Representations of palliative care euthanasia and assisted dying within advocacy declarations

机译:在宣告声明中代表姑息治疗安乐死和协助死亡

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is well known that there are disagreements between the proponents of palliative care and of euthanasia or assisted dying, often with little common ground,shaping the end of life discourse internationally. Advocacy documents or ‘declarations’constitute a significant feature of this discourse. The aim of this study was to explore the content of such declarations and to focus on what they can tell us about palliative care and assisted dying and their dispositions towards one another. 104 declarations were identified and included in the study, covering the period 1974 to 2017. These declarations were analysed following the principles of thematic content analysis. We classified them based on their primary purpose: those with the goal of advocating for palliative care services, education and research were grouped under ‘palliative care declarations’; those with the primary objective of advocating for or against euthanasia/assisted dying were classified as “euthanasia/assisted dying declarations”. Our analysis revealed that the content of the declarations could be broadly categorised into three dimensions: framing, claiming and demanding. We demonstrate that these declarations reveal a struggle over the construction of meanings relating to palliative care and assisted dying and constitute a valuable resource for the analysis of an unfolding debate.
机译:众所周知,姑息治疗支持者和安乐死支持者或辅助死亡支持者之间存在分歧,通常没有什么共同点,这在国际上终结了生命的终结。辩护文件或“声明”构成了该论述的重要特征。这项研究的目的是探讨此类声明的内容,并集中于它们可以告诉我们有关姑息治疗和辅助死亡及其相互之间的处置的信息。确定了104项声明,并将其纳入研究范围,涵盖1974年至2017年。按照主题内容分析的原则对这些声明进行了分析。我们根据他们的主要目的对他们进行了分类:那些旨在倡导姑息治疗服务,教育和研究的人被归类为“姑息治疗声明”;那些以主张或反对安乐死/辅助死亡为主要目的的人被归类为“安乐死/辅助死亡声明”。我们的分析表明,声明的内容可以大致分为三个维度:框架,要求和要求。我们证明,这些声明揭示了与姑息治疗和辅助死亡有关的意义构建的斗争,并构成了进行中辩论的宝贵资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号