首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Taylor Francis Open Select >A Comparison of the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) and the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) for the Quantitative Evaluation of Autism
【2h】

A Comparison of the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) and the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) for the Quantitative Evaluation of Autism

机译:自闭症治疗评估清单(ATEC)和儿童自闭症评分量表(CARS)的定量评估自闭症的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to evaluate scores generated from the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC), a parent-rated measure, and those derived from professionally completed Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) evaluations. A cohort of 56 participants diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder was used for the study, and each child was evaluated independently by the parent using the ATEC and a health care professional using the CARS. The Spearman's rank correlation statistic ρ was used to evaluate the correlation between ATEC and CARS scores. It was observed that there was a significant correlation between total ATEC and CARS scores (ρ = .71). Specific domains in the ATEC evaluation significantly correlated with CARS scores. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic confirmed the association between CARS and ATEC domains. The results help to validate the utility of the parentally completed ATEC in comparison with an established, professional-related measure of autism.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估由自闭症治疗评估清单(ATEC)生成的得分,该得分由父母评定,以及由专业完成的儿童自闭症评定量表(CARS)评估得出的得分。这项研究共纳入了56名被诊断患有自闭症谱系障碍的参与者,每个孩子都由父母使用ATEC进行独立评估,并使用CARS对医疗保健专业人员进行独立评估。 Spearman等级相关统计量ρ用于评估ATEC和CARS得分之间的相关性。据观察,总ATEC和CARS得分之间存在显着相关性(ρ= .71)。 ATEC评估中的特定领域与CARS得分显着相关。敏感性,特异性和受体操作特性证实了CARS和ATEC域之间的关联。与已建立的,与专业相关的自闭症测评相比,研究结果有助于验证父母完成的ATEC的实用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号