首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Taylor Francis Open Select >Language and iconic gesture use in procedural discourse by speakers with aphasia
【2h】

Language and iconic gesture use in procedural discourse by speakers with aphasia

机译:失语者在程序性话语中使用语言和标志性手势

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Conveying instructions is an everyday use of language, and gestures are likely to be a key feature of this. Although co-speech iconic gestures are tightly integrated with language, and people with aphasia (PWA) produce procedural discourses impaired at a linguistic level, no previous studies have investigated how PWA use co-speech iconic gestures in these contexts. Aims: This study investigated how PWA communicated meaning using gesture and language in procedural discourses, compared with neurologically healthy people (NHP). We aimed to identify the relative relationship of gesture and speech, in the context of impaired language, both overall and in individual events. Methods & Procedures: Twenty-nine PWA and 29 NHP produced two procedural discourses. The structure and semantic content of language of the whole discourses were analysed through predicate argument structure and spatial motor terms, and gestures were analysed for frequency and semantic form. Gesture and language were analysed in two key events, to determine the relative information presented in each modality. Outcomes & Results: PWA and NHP used similar frequencies and forms of gestures, although PWA used syntactically simpler language and fewer spatial words. This meant, overall, relatively more information was present in PWA gesture. This finding was also reflected in the key events, where PWA used gestures conveying rich semantic information alongside semantically impoverished language more often than NHP. Conclusions: PWA gestures, containing semantic information omitted from the concurrent speech, may help listeners with meaning when language is impaired. This finding indicates gesture should be included in clinical assessments of meaning-making.
机译:背景:传达指令是日常使用的语言,手势很可能是其中的一项主要功能。尽管共同语音图标手势与语言紧密集成,并且失语症患者(PWA)会在语言水平上损害程序性话语,但是以前没有研究研究PWA如何在这些情况下使用共同语音图标手势。目的:本研究调查了PWA与神经系统健康人(NHP)相比,如何在程序语言中使用手势和语言传达含义。我们的目标是在语言受损的情况下,从整体和个别事件中识别手势和语音的相对关系。方法与程序:29个PWA和29个NHP产生了两个程序性论述。通过谓词的论证结构和空间运动术语分析了整个语篇的语言结构和语义内容,并分析了手势的频率和语义形式。在两个关键事件中对手势和语言进行了分析,以确定每种方式中显示的相对信息。结果与结果:尽管PWA在语法上使用了更简单的语言并且使用了较少的空间词,但是PWA和NHP使用了相似的频率和手势形式。这意味着,总体而言,PWA手势中存在相对更多的信息。这一发现还反映在关键事件中,在关键事件中,与NHP相比,PWA使用手势传达丰富的语义信息以及语义贫困的语言的频率更高。结论:PWA手势包含并发语音中省略的语义信息,可以在语言受损时帮助听众理解。这一发现表明手势应被包括在意义形成的临床评估中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号