首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Posterior reconstruction and anterior suspension with single anastomotic suture in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a simple method to improve early return of continence
【2h】

Posterior reconstruction and anterior suspension with single anastomotic suture in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a simple method to improve early return of continence

机译:机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中单吻合缝合的后路重建和前路悬吊术

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence is a major cause of morbidity from radical prostatectomy. Efforts have been made to develop techniques to hasten return of urinary control. Several authors have demonstrated improved early continence with anterior, posterior, or combined reconstruction of the urethral–pelvic attachments. In this study, we compare three-month urinary function and continence data for patients who underwent RALP with posterior reconstruction and anterior suspension with single anastomotic suture (PRASS). A prospective cohort of 50 patients underwent RALP with PRASS reconstruction and were compared to 50 control patients who underwent standard RALP. Continence was defined as use of 0–1 urinary pads and was evaluated at each follow-up visit using the EPIC-26 questionnaire. A weighted summary score was created and group differences were compared using a repeated measures analysis of variance model. After adjusting for age, baseline AUA symptom score, and SHIM scores, which were found to correlate with continence, patients who underwent the PRASS reconstruction had significantly improved urinary control at three months compared with the control group; 90.9% of the patients in the PRASS group wore 0–1 pads per day versus 48.2% in the control group (P = 0.014). Of the patients undergoing the standard prostatectomy 20.6% were totally pad-free compared with 42% of the patients undergoing the PRASS procedure (P = 0.042). In conclusion, the PRASS technique resulted in statistically significant improvement in urinary control three months post-operation. The PRASS reconstruction is technically straightforward, requires no additional sutures, and is a simple technique that is easily learned and adaptable to other robotic surgery.
机译:前列腺切除术后尿失禁是前列腺癌根治术后发病的主要原因。已经做出努力来开发技术以加速泌尿控制的恢复。几位作者证明了尿道-盆腔附件的前,后或联合重建可改善早期节制。在这项研究中,我们比较了接受单吻合口缝合术(PRASS)后路重建和前路悬吊的RALP患者的三个月尿功能和尿量数据。前瞻性队列的50例行PRASS重建的RALP患者与50例接受标准RALP的对照患者进行了比较。尿失禁定义为使用0-1尿垫,并在每次随访时使用EPIC-26问卷进行评估。创建加权汇总分数,并使用方差模型的重复测量分析比较组差异。调整年龄,基线AUA症状评分和SHIM评分(与尿失禁相关)后,进行PRASS重建的患者与对照组相比,在三个月时的尿液控制显着改善。 PRASS组中90.9%的患者每天佩戴0-1片护垫,而对照组中则为48.2%(P = 0.014)。在进行标准前列腺切除术的患者中,有20.6%的患者完全没有垫子,而在进行PRASS手术的患者中有42%(P = 0.042)。总之,手术后三个月,PRASS技术可显着改善泌尿控制。 PRASS重建技术上简单明了,不需要额外的缝合线,是一种简单易学且易于适应其他机器人手术的技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号