首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Nondestructive analysis of single crystals of selenide spinels by X-ray spectrometry techniques
【2h】

Nondestructive analysis of single crystals of selenide spinels by X-ray spectrometry techniques

机译:X射线光谱技术对硒尖晶石单晶进行无损分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The paper presents possibilities and difficulties in nondestructive analysis of small multielement single crystals performed by means of X-ray spectrometry techniques: micro-X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (μ-XRF), energy-dispersive electron probe microanalysis (ED-EPMA), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The capability of the X-ray spectroscopy techniques in elemental analysis is demonstrated with the single crystals of selenide spinels of the general formula MxNyCrzSe4 (M+2 and N+3 are, for example, Zn+2, V+3, Ga+3, Cd+2, In+3, and Sb+3). The results of the nondestructive analyses (μ-XRF, ED-EPMA, and XPS) are compared with those obtained by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) and wavelength-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (WDXRF) following sample digestion. The present study shows satisfactory agreement between the results of μ-XRF analysis performed using the standardless fundamental parameter method and the results obtained with the WDXRF and ICP-OES analyses. If the measured single crystal is precisely positioned, the difference between μ-XRF and wet analysis (WDXRF and ICP-OES) does not exceed 5% rel. The reliable results of ED-EPMA can be obtained only if the measured area is sufficiently large, i.e., of 200 × 300 μm. Even if this condition is fulfilled, the relative difference between the ED-EPMA and the wet analysis may reach 10% rel. In case of the XPS analysis, the accuracy of results depends on the proper preparation of the sample surface. It should be free of contamination that can be obtained by scraping in situ in ultrahigh vacuum. The ion etching, commonly used for cleaning the surface, leads to preferential sputtering; therefore, the reliable results cannot be obtained.>FigureThe paper presents possibilities and difficulties in nondestructive analysis of small multielement single crystals performed by means of X-ray spectrometry techniques: micro-XRF, ED-EPMA and XPS.
机译:本文介绍了利用X射线光谱技术对小型多元素单晶进行无损分析的可能性和困难:微X射线荧光光谱法(μ-XRF),能量色散电子探针微分析(ED-EPMA)和X射线光电子能谱(XPS)。 X射线光谱技术在元素分析中的能力由具有以下通式的MxNyCrzSe4(M +2 和N +3 为例如Zn +2 ,V +3 ,Ga +3 ,Cd +2 ,In +3 和Sb +3 )。将无损分析(μ-XRF,ED-EPMA和XPS)的结果与样品消解后通过电感耦合等离子体发射光谱(ICP-OES)和波长色散X射线光谱(WDXRF)获得的结果进行比较。本研究表明,使用无标准基本参数方法进行的μ-XRF分析结果与使用WDXRF和ICP-OES分析获得的结果之间令人满意的一致性。如果将测得的单晶精确定位,则μ-XRF和湿法分析(WDXRF和ICP-OES)之间的差异不超过5%rel。 ED-EPMA的可靠结果只有在被测面积足够大,即200×300μm的情况下才能获得。即使满足此条件,ED-EPMA和湿法分析之间的相对差也可能达到10%rel。对于XPS分析,结果的准确性取决于样品表面的正确准备。它应该没有通过超高真空原位刮擦而获得的污染。通常用于清洁表面的离子蚀刻会导致优先溅射。因此,无法获得可靠的结果。<!-fig ft0-> <!-fig @ position =“ anchor” mode = article f4-> <!-fig mode =“ anchored” f5-> > Figure <!-fig / graphic | fig / alternatives / graphic mode =“ anchored” m1-> <!-标题a7->本文提出了对进行的小型多元素单晶进行无损分析的可能性和困难通过X射线光谱技术:微型XRF,ED-EPMA和XPS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号