首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Psychometric challenges and proposed solutions when scoring facial emotion expression codes
【2h】

Psychometric challenges and proposed solutions when scoring facial emotion expression codes

机译:评分面部表情代码时的心理测验挑战和建议的解决方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Coding of facial emotion expressions is increasingly performed by automated emotion expression scoring software; however, there is limited discussion on how best to score the resulting codes. We present a discussion of facial emotion expression theories and a review of contemporary emotion expression coding methodology. We highlight methodological challenges pertinent to scoring software-coded facial emotion expression codes and present important psychometric research questions centered on comparing competing scoring procedures of these codes. Then, on the basis of a time series data set collected to assess individual differences in facial emotion expression ability, we derive, apply, and evaluate several statistical procedures, including four scoring methods and four data treatments, to score software-coded emotion expression data. These scoring procedures are illustrated to inform analysis decisions pertaining to the scoring and data treatment of other emotion expression questions and under different experimental circumstances. Overall, we found applying loess smoothing and controlling for baseline facial emotion expression and facial plasticity are recommended methods of data treatment. When scoring facial emotion expression ability, maximum score is preferred. Finally, we discuss the scoring methods and data treatments in the larger context of emotion expression research.
机译:面部表情表达的编码越来越多地由自动表情表达评分软件执行;但是,关于如何最好地给结果代码评分的讨论很少。我们提出了面部表情表达理论的讨论和当代情感表达编码方法的回顾。我们重点介绍与评分软件编码的面部情绪表达代码有关的方法挑战,并提出以比较这些代码的竞争评分程序为中心的重要心理测量研究问题。然后,基于收集的时间序列数据集以评估面部表情表达能力的个体差异,我们推导,应用和评估几种统计程序,包括四种评分方法和四种数据处理方法,以对软件编码的表情表达数据进行评分。说明了这些计分程序,以告知与其他情绪表达问题的计分和数据处理有关的分析决策,并在不同的实验环境下进行。总的来说,我们发现黄土平滑和控制基线面部表情和面部可塑性是推荐的数据处理方法。在对面部表情表达能力进行评分时,最好是最高分。最后,我们在更大范围的情感表达研究中讨论了评分方法和数据处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号