首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >A Whole Community Approach toward Child and Youth Resilience Promotion: A Review of Resilience Literature
【2h】

A Whole Community Approach toward Child and Youth Resilience Promotion: A Review of Resilience Literature

机译:促进儿童和青少年复原力的全社区方法:复原力文献综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A literature review of child and youth resilience with a focus on: definitions and factors of resilience; relationships between resilience, mental health and social outcomes; evidence for resilience promoting interventions; and implications for reducing health inequities. To conduct the review, the first two following steps were conducted iteratively and informed the third step: 1) Review of published peer-review literature since 2000; and 2) Review of grey literature; and 3) Quasi-realist synthesis of evidence. Evidence from three perspectives were examined: i) whether interventions can improve ‘resilience’ for vulnerable children and youth; ii) whether there is a differential effect among different populations; and, iii) whether there is evidence that resilience interventions ‘close the gap’ on health and social outcome measures. Definitions of resilience vary as do perspectives on it. We argue for a hybrid approach that recognizes the value of combining multiple theoretical perspectives, epistemologies (positivistic and constructivist/interpretive/critical) in studying resilience. Resilience is: a) a process (rather than a single event), b) a continuum (rather than a binary outcome), and c) likely a global concept with specific dimensions. Individual, family and social environmental factors influence resilience. A social determinants perspective on resilience and mental health is emphasized. Programs and interventions to promoting resilience should be complimentary to public health measures addressing the social determinants of health. A whole community approach to resilience is suggested as a step toward closing the public health policy gap. Local initiatives that stimulate a local transformation process are needed. Recognition of each child’s or youth’s intersections of gender, lifestage, family resources within the context of their identity markers fits with a localized approach to resilience promotion and, at the same time, requires recognition of the broader determinants of population health.
机译:关于儿童和青年弹性的文献综述,重点是:弹性的定义和因素;复原力,心理健康与社会成果之间的关系;有弹性的干预措施证据;及其对减少健康不平等的影响。为了进行评审,以下的前两个步骤是反复进行的,并告知了第三步:1)评审自2000年以来已发表的同行评审文献; 2)灰色文献综述; 3)准现实主义的证据综合。从三个角度审查了证据:i)干预措施是否可以提高弱势儿童和青年的“复原力”; ii)不同人群之间的影响是否存在差异; iii)是否有证据表明,抵御能力干预措施“缩小了健康和社会成果衡量标准的差距”。弹性的定义因其观点而异。我们主张采用一种混合方法,该方法应认识到在研究弹性时将多种理论观点,认识论(实证主义和建构主义/解释性/批判性)相结合的价值。复原力是:a)一个过程(而不是单个事件),b)连续体(而不是二进制结果),以及c)可能是具有特定维度的全局概念。个人,家庭和社会环境因素影响弹性。强调了关于韧性和心理健康的社会决定因素观点。旨在增强抵御能力的计划和干预措施应与解决健康的社会决定因素的公共卫生措施相辅相成。建议采取整个社区的抵御能力方法,以此作为缩小公共卫生政策差距的一步。需要刺激本地转型过程的本地计划。在他们的身份标记的背景下识别每个孩子的性别,生命阶段,家庭资源的交集符合本地化的抵御能力提升方法,同时,还需要识别更广泛的人口健康决定因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号