首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Framework for the Analysis of Nanotechnologies’ Impacts and Ethical Acceptability: Basis of an Interdisciplinary Approach to Assessing Novel Technologies
【2h】

Framework for the Analysis of Nanotechnologies’ Impacts and Ethical Acceptability: Basis of an Interdisciplinary Approach to Assessing Novel Technologies

机译:纳米技术影响和伦理可接受性分析的框架:评估新技术的跨学科方法的基础

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The genetically manipulated organism (GMO) crisis demonstrated that technological development based solely on the law of the marketplace and State protection against serious risks to health and safety is no longer a warrant of ethical acceptability. In the first part of our paper, we critique the implicitly individualist social-acceptance model for State regulation of technology and recommend an interdisciplinary approach for comprehensive analysis of the impacts and ethical acceptability of technologies. In the second part, we present a framework for the analysis of impacts and acceptability, devised—with the goal of supporting the development of specific nanotechnological applications—by a team of researchers from various disciplines. At the conceptual level, this analytic framework is intended to make explicit those various operations required in preparing a judgement about the acceptability of technologies that have been implicit in the classical analysis of toxicological risk. On a practical level, we present a reflective tool that makes it possible to take into account all the dimensions involved and understand the reasons invoked in determining impacts, assessing them, and arriving at a judgement about acceptability.
机译:转基因生物(GMO)危机表明,仅基于市场法和国家防范严重健康与安全风险的技术开发已不再是道德上可接受的保证。在本文的第一部分,我们对技术对国家的管制的隐含个人主义社会接受模型进行了批评,并提出了一种跨学科的方法来对技术的影响和伦理可接受性进行综合分析。在第二部分中,我们提出了一个影响和可接受性分析的框架,该框架是由来自各个学科的研究人员团队设计的,目的是支持特定纳米技术应用程序的开发。从概念上讲,此分析框架旨在明确进行毒理学风险经典分析中隐含的对技术可接受性的判断所需的各种操作。在实践的层面上,我们提供了一种反思性工具,可以考虑到所涉及的所有方面并了解在确定影响,评估影响以及对可接受性做出判断时调用的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号