首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Genetic and chemical characterization of white and red peony root derived from Paeonia lactiflora
【2h】

Genetic and chemical characterization of white and red peony root derived from Paeonia lactiflora

机译:Pa药牡丹白牡丹和红牡丹的遗传和化学特性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two kinds of peony roots—white peony root (WPR) and red peony root (RPR)—are used for different remedies in traditional Chinese medicine; however, most of them are derived from the same botanical origin, Paeonia lactiflora. The difference between WPR and RPR has been debated for a long time. This study attempted to clarify the genetic and chemical characteristics of WPR and RPR in order to provide a scientific dataset for their identification and effective use. The nucleotide sequence of nrDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the contents of 8 main bioactive constituents were analyzed from specimens of P. lactiflora, P. veitchii and two related species as well as crude drug samples of WPR, RPR and peony root produced in Japan. Of the samples derived from P. lactiflora, the WPR produced in the southern parts of China and the RPR produced in the northern parts of China were clearly divided into two subgroups within the P. lactiflora group based on similarity of the ITS sequences. The nucleotides at positions 69, 458 and 523 upstream of the ITS sequence served as molecular markers to discriminate between WPR and RPR. Quantitative analysis indicated that the RPR samples obviously contained a higher content of paeoniflorin and paeonol, but a lower content of albiflorin than the WPR produced in the southern parts of China and peony root produced in Japan. The WPR available from Chinese markets was usually processed by sulfur fumigation, which resulted in an extremely low content of paeoniflorin. This study indicated that WPR and RPR were not only geographically isolated, but also genetically and chemically separated. The ITS sequence provided a genetic index for their identification.
机译:在传统中药中,有两种牡丹根–白牡丹根(WPR)和红牡丹根(RPR)–用于不同的治疗方法。但是,它们大多数都来自相同的植物来源,即Pa药牡丹。 WPR和RPR之间的区别已经争论了很长时间。这项研究试图阐明WPR和RPR的遗传和化学特征,以便为它们的鉴定和有效使用提供科学的数据集。从产的乳酸假单胞菌(P. lactiflora),葡萄假单胞菌(P. veitchii)和两个相关物种的标本以及WPR,RPR和牡丹的粗药样品中分析了nrDNA内部转录间隔区(ITS)的核苷酸序列和8种主要生物活性成分的含量。日本。在源自乳酸假单胞菌的样品中,基于ITS序列的相似性,在中国南部产生的WPR和在中国北部产生的RPR被清楚地分为乳酸假单胞菌组内的两个亚组。 ITS序列上游69、458和523位的核苷酸用作区分WPR和RPR的分子标记。定量分析表明,RPR样品中contained药苷和pa药的含量明显高于中国南部地区的WPR和日本产的牡丹根,而bi粉苷的含量较低。来自中国市场的WPR通常是通过硫熏蒸处理的,这导致pa药苷的含量极低。这项研究表明,WPR和RPR不仅在地理上是分离的,而且在遗传和化学上都是分离的。 ITS序列为它们的鉴定提供了遗传指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号