首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >The association of previously reported polymorphisms for microvascular complications in a meta-analysis of diabetic retinopathy
【2h】

The association of previously reported polymorphisms for microvascular complications in a meta-analysis of diabetic retinopathy

机译:糖尿病视网膜病变荟萃分析中先前报道的多态性与微血管并发症的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We investigated the association of signals from previous GWAS and candidate gene meta-analyses for diabetic retinopathy (DR) or nephropathy (DN), as well as an EPO variant in meta-analyses of severe (SDR) and mild diabetic retinopathy (MDR). Meta-analyses of SDR (≥severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) or history of panretinal photocoagulation) and MDR (≥mild NPDR), defined based on seven-field stereoscopic fundus photographs, were performed in two well-characterized type 1 diabetes (T1D) cohorts: the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC, n = 1,304) and Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy (WESDR, n = 603). Among 34 previous signals for DR, after controlling for multiple testing, no association was replicated in our meta-analyses. rs1571942 and rs12219125 at PLXDC2 locus showed nominally significant (<0.05) association with SDR in the same direction as previous report, as did rs1801282 in PPARG gene with MDR. Among 55 loci previously associated with DN, three showed suggestive associations with SDR in our study without maintaining significance after correction for multiple testing. Of particular interest, rs1617640 (EPO) was not significantly associated with DR status, combined SDR–DN phenotype, time to SDR or time to DN (all P > 0.05). Lack of replication of previous DR hits and EPO despite reasonable statistical power implies that many of these may be false positives. Consistent with pleiotropy, we provide suggestive collective evidence for association between DR and variants previously associated with DN without reaching statistical significance at any single locus.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00439-014-1517-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:我们调查了先前的GWAS信号与糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)或肾病(DN)的候选基因荟萃分析之间的关联,以及严重(SDR)和轻度糖尿病视网膜病变(MDR)荟萃分析中的EPO变体。在两个特征明确的1型糖尿病患者中,根据七场立体眼底照片对SDR(≥严重非增殖性糖尿病性视网膜病(NPDR)或全视网膜光凝史)和MDR(≥轻度NPDR)进行了荟萃分析。 (T1D)队列:糖尿病干预与并发症的糖尿病控制和并发症试验/流行病学(DCCT / EDIC,n = 1,304)和糖尿病视网膜病变的威斯康星流行病学研究(WESDR,n = 603)。在先前的34个DR信号中,在控制了多个测试后,我们的荟萃分析未发现任何关联。 PLXDC2基因座处的rs1571942和rs12219125与SDR在名义上显着相关(<0.05),与先前报告的方向相同,MDR的PPARG基因中的rs1801282也是如此。在先前与DN相关的55个基因座中,有3个在我们的研究中显示与SDR具有暗示性关联,但在多次测试校正后仍无显着意义。特别令人感兴趣的是,rs1617640(EPO)与DR状态,合并的SDR-DN表型,达到SDR的时间或达到DN的时间没有显着相关(所有P> 0.05)。尽管具有合理的统计能力,但仍无法复制先前的DR匹配和EPO,这意味着其中许多可能是假阳性。与多效性相一致,我们为DR和先前与DN相关的变体之间的关联提供了暗示性的集体证据,但在任何单个位点都没有统计学意义。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s00439-014-1517-2)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号