首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Mechanisms driving diversity–productivity relationships differ between exotic and native communities and are affected by gastropod herbivory
【2h】

Mechanisms driving diversity–productivity relationships differ between exotic and native communities and are affected by gastropod herbivory

机译:外来社区与本土社区之间驱动多样性与生产力关系的机制不同并受腹足类食草动物的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Biodiversity experiments have shown that productivity usually increases with plant species richness. However, most of those studies disregarded the importance of trophic interactions to the diversity–productivity relationship, and focused on the loss of native species while ignoring invasions by exotic species. Yet, as functional complementarity and the impact of plant antagonists are likely to differ between native and exotic communities, the diversity–productivity relationship may change when native communities are invaded by exotic species. We conducted a mesocosm experiment to test how diversity effects, evenness, and productivity differed between exotic and native assemblages of grassland plants, and how these communities were influenced by slug herbivory. In line with other experiments, we found higher productivity in exotic than in native communities. However, different mechanisms (complementarity vs. selection effect) contributed to the positive diversity–productivity relationships in exotic vs. native communities. Against expectations, native communities showed much lower evenness and a greater selection effect, suggesting that competitive dominance among native species may be even stronger than among exotic species. Slug herbivory decreased productivity independently of species origin and species diversity. However, exotic communities showed a threefold higher complementarity effect than native communities in the absence of slugs, which was mainly driven by differences in the responses of native and exotic legumes and nonleguminous herbs. Our results imply that underlying mechanisms for the positive diversity–productivity relationship differ between native and exotic communities in the early stages of community development, and that differential responses of plant functional groups to generalist herbivory can contribute to this pattern.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00442-015-3395-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:生物多样性实验表明,生产力通常随植物物种的丰富而增加。但是,这些研究大多数都忽略了营养相互作用对多样性与生产力关系的重要性,而侧重于丧失本土物种而忽略了外来物种的入侵。然而,由于功能性互补和植物拮抗剂的影响在本地社区和外来社区之间可能会有所不同,因此当本地社区受到外来物种入侵时,多样性与生产力的关系可能会发生变化。我们进行了介观试验,测试了异国草场和本土草场组合之间的多样性效应,均匀性和生产力如何差异,以及虫食草对这些群落的影响。与其他实验一致,我们发现异国情调的生产力比本地社区更高。但是,不同的机制(互补效应与选择效应)促成了异国社区与本土社区之间积极的多样性与生产力的关系。出乎意料的是,土著社区的平整度低得多,选择效果更好,这表明土著物种之间的竞争优势可能甚至比外来物种更具竞争优势。 ug食草动物降低了生产力,而与物种起源和物种多样性无关。然而,在没有的情况下,外来社区表现出的互补效应是本地社区的三倍,这主要是由于本地和外来豆科植物和非豆科植物的反应差异所致。我们的结果表明,在社区发展的早期,本地社区和外来社区之间积极的多样性与生产力关系的基本机制不同,并且植物功能群对通才草食动物的不同反应也可能有助于这种模式。电子补充材料本文(doi:10.1007 / s00442-015-3395-2)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号