首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Dissociating proactive and reactive control in the Stroop task
【2h】

Dissociating proactive and reactive control in the Stroop task

机译:在Stroop任务中分离主动和被动控制

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Dual Mechanisms of Control framework posits the existence of two distinct control mechanisms, proactive and reactive, which may operate independently. However, this independence has been difficult to study with most experimental paradigms. The Stroop task may provide a useful way of assessing the independence of control mechanisms because the task elicits two types of proportion congruency effects, list-wide and item-specific, thought to reflect proactive and reactive control respectively. The present research tested whether these two proportion congruency effects can be used to dissociate proactive and reactive control. In 2 separate participant samples, we demonstrate that list-wide and item-specific proportion congruency effects are stable, exist in the same participants, and appear in different task conditions. Moreover, we identify two distinct behavioral signatures, the congruency cost and the transfer cost, which doubly dissociate the two effects. Together, the results are consistent with the view that proactive and reactive control reflect independent mechanisms.
机译:“双重控制机制”框架假定存在两个独立的控制机制,即主动和被动控制机制,可以独立运行。但是,这种独立性很难用大多数实验范例来研究。 Stroop任务可能提供一种评估控制机制独立性的有用方法,因为该任务引发了两种比例一致效果,即列表范围和项目特定效果,被认为分别反映了主动控制和被动控制。本研究测试了这两个比例的一致性效应是否可用于解离主动控制和反应控制。在2个单独的参与者样本中,我们证明了列表范围和项目特定的比例一致性效果是稳定的,存在于同一参与者中,并且出现在不同的任务条件下。此外,我们确定了两个截然不同的行为特征,即全合成本和转移成本,它们使两种效应相互分离。总之,结果与以下观点一致:主动和被动控制反映了独立的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号