首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Perinatal practice in extreme premature delivery: variation in Dutch physicians’ preferences despite guideline
【2h】

Perinatal practice in extreme premature delivery: variation in Dutch physicians’ preferences despite guideline

机译:极端早产的围产期实践:尽管有指导原则荷兰医生的喜好有所不同

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Decisions at the limits of viability about initiating care are challenging. We aimed to investigate physicians’ preferences on treatment decisions, against the background of the 2010 Dutch guideline offering active care from 24+0/7 weeks of gestational age (GA). Obstetricians’ and neonatologists’ opinions were compared. An online survey was conducted amongst all perinatal professionals (n = 205) of the 10 Dutch level III perinatal care centers. Response rate was 60 % (n = 122). Comfort care was mostly recommended below 24+0/7 weeks and intensive care over 26+0/7 weeks. The professional views varied most at 24 and 25 weeks, with intensive care recommended but comfort care at parental request optional being the median. There was a wide range in perceived lowest limits of GA for interventions as a caesarian section and a neonatologist present at birth. Obstetricians and neonatologists disagreed on the lowest limit providing chest compressions and administering epinephrine for resuscitation. The main factors restricting active treatment were presence of congenital disorders, “small for gestational age” fetus, and incomplete course of corticosteroids.Conclusion: There was a wide variety in individually preferred treatment decisions, especially when aspects were not covered in the Dutch guideline on perinatal practice in extreme prematurity. Furthermore, obstetricians and neonatologists did not always agree. frame="hsides" rules="groups" class="rendered small default_table">> colspan="2" rowspan="1"> >What is known:
• Cross-cultural differences exists in the preferred treatment at the limits of viability
• In the Netherlands since 2010, intensive care can be offered starting at 24 +0/7  weeks gestation > colspan="2" rowspan="1"> >What is new:
• There was a wide variety in preferred treatment decisions at the limits of viability especially when aspects were not covered in the Dutch national guideline on perinatal practice in extreme prematurity.
机译:在可行的范围内就开始护理的决策具有挑战性。我们旨在调查医生对治疗决策的偏爱,以2010年荷兰指南为背景,从24周(sup> +0/7 胎龄(GA)开始提供积极护理。比较了产科医生和新生儿科医生的意见。在荷兰的10个III级围产期护理中心中,对所有围产期专业人员(n = 205)进行了在线调查。回应率为60%(n = 122)。建议在24 +0/7 周以下进行舒适护理,在26 +0/7 周进行重症监护。专业意见在24周和25周时变化最大,建议重症监护,但应父母的要求选择舒适性护理为中位数。作为剖腹产和新生儿产科医生,干预的公认最低遗传限度范围很广。妇产科医生和新生儿科医生在最低限度上存在分歧,他们提供胸部按压并使用肾上腺素进行复苏。限制积极治疗的主要因素是先天性疾病的存在,“胎龄少”的胎儿以及皮质类固醇激素治疗过程的不完全。结论:个人首选治疗方案的种类繁多,尤其是在荷兰指南中未涵盖的方面围产期练习极度早产。此外,妇产科医生和新生儿科医生并不总是同意。<!-table ft1-> <!-table-wrap mode =“ anchored” t5-> frame =“ hsides” rules =“ groups” class =“较小的default_table“> > colspan =” 2“ rowspan =” 1“> >已知信息:
•跨文化差异存在于生存能力的局限性
•自2010年以来,在荷兰,可以从妊娠24 +0/7 开始提供重症监护 > colspan =“ 2” rowspan =“ 1”> >新功能:
•在生存能力方面,尤其是在荷兰国民未涵盖某些方面的情况下,首选治疗决策的种类繁多极端早产的围产期操作指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号