首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >The moral obligation to be vaccinated: utilitarianism contractualism and collective easy rescue
【2h】

The moral obligation to be vaccinated: utilitarianism contractualism and collective easy rescue

机译:需要接种的道德义务:功利主义契约主义和集体容易救助

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We argue that individuals who have access to vaccines and for whom vaccination is not medically contraindicated have a moral obligation to contribute to the realisation of herd immunity by being vaccinated. Contrary to what some have claimed, we argue that this individual moral obligation exists in spite of the fact that each individual vaccination does not significantly affect vaccination coverage rates and therefore does not significantly contribute to herd immunity. Establishing the existence of a moral obligation to be vaccinated (both for adults and for children) despite the negligible contribution each vaccination can make to the realisation of herd immunity is important because such moral obligation would strengthen the justification for coercive vaccination policies. We show that two types of arguments—namely a utilitarian argument based on Parfit’s Principle of Group Beneficence and a contractualist argument—can ground an individual moral obligation to be vaccinated, in spite of the imperceptible contribution that any single vaccination makes to vaccine coverage rates. We add a further argument for a moral obligation to be vaccinated that does not require embracing problematic comprehensive moral theories such as utilitarianism or contractualism. The argument is based on a “duty of easy rescue” applied to collectives, which grounds a collective moral obligation to realise herd immunity, and on a principle of fairness in the distribution of the burdens that must be borne to realise herd immunity.
机译:我们认为,可以接种疫苗且未在医学上禁忌接种疫苗的人有道义义务通过接种疫苗为实现牛群免疫做出贡献。与某些人声称的相反,我们认为,尽管每个单独的疫苗接种均不会显着影响疫苗接种率,因此不会显着促进畜群免疫,但仍存在这种个人道德义务。尽管每次疫苗接种对实现畜群免疫所做的贡献微不足道,但仍要确立有道德义务的疫苗接种(成人和儿童),这一点很重要,因为这种道德义务将加强强制接种政策的正当性。我们展示了两种类型的论点,即基于Parfit的团体受益原则的功利主义论点和契约主义论点,尽管任何一次疫苗接种都对疫苗覆盖率产生了不可察觉的贡献,却可以使个人的道德义务得到免疫。我们增加了另一种论点,即可以接受一种无需承担任何问题的全面道德理论(如功利主义或契约论)的道德义务的预防。该论点是基于适用于集体的“轻松营救的职责”,该集体以实现集体豁免权的集体道德义务为基础,并基于公平分配原则来实现集体豁免权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号