首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Do We Need a Cool-Down After Exercise? A Narrative Review of the Psychophysiological Effects and the Effects on Performance Injuries and the Long-Term Adaptive Response
【2h】

Do We Need a Cool-Down After Exercise? A Narrative Review of the Psychophysiological Effects and the Effects on Performance Injuries and the Long-Term Adaptive Response

机译:运动后我们需要冷静吗?叙述性的心理生理效应及其对运动伤害和长期适应性反应的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is widely believed that an active cool-down is more effective for promoting post-exercise recovery than a passive cool-down involving no activity. However, research on this topic has never been synthesized and it therefore remains largely unknown whether this belief is correct. This review compares the effects of various types of active cool-downs with passive cool-downs on sports performance, injuries, long-term adaptive responses, and psychophysiological markers of post-exercise recovery. An active cool-down is largely ineffective with respect to enhancing same-day and next-day(s) sports performance, but some beneficial effects on next-day(s) performance have been reported. Active cool-downs do not appear to prevent injuries, and preliminary evidence suggests that performing an active cool-down on a regular basis does not attenuate the long-term adaptive response. Active cool-downs accelerate recovery of lactate in blood, but not necessarily in muscle tissue. Performing active cool-downs may partially prevent immune system depression and promote faster recovery of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. However, it is unknown whether this reduces the likelihood of post-exercise illnesses, syncope, and cardiovascular complications. Most evidence indicates that active cool-downs do not significantly reduce muscle soreness, or improve the recovery of indirect markers of muscle damage, neuromuscular contractile properties, musculotendinous stiffness, range of motion, systemic hormonal concentrations, or measures of psychological recovery. It can also interfere with muscle glycogen resynthesis. In summary, based on the empirical evidence currently available, active cool-downs are largely ineffective for improving most psychophysiological markers of post-exercise recovery, but may nevertheless offer some benefits compared with a passive cool-down.
机译:普遍认为,主动冷却比不涉及任何活动的被动冷却更有效地促进运动后恢复。但是,关于这一主题的研究从未得到综合,因此,这种信念是否正确尚不清楚。这篇综述比较了各种类型的主动降温与被动降温对运动表现,伤害,长期适应性反应以及运动后恢复的心理生理指标的影响。主动降温对于提高当日和次日运动表现基本上无效,但是据报道对次日表现有一些有益影响。主动降温似乎不能预防伤害,并且初步证据表明,定期进行主动降温不会减弱长期的适应性反应。主动的冷却可以加速血液中乳酸的恢复,但不一定能促进肌肉组织中的乳酸恢复。进行主动的降温可以部分防止免疫系统下降,并促进心血管和呼吸系统的更快恢复。但是,尚不清楚这是否会降低运动后疾病,晕厥和心血管并发症的可能性。大多数证据表明,主动的冷静并不能明显减轻肌肉酸痛,也不能改善肌肉损伤,神经肌肉收缩特性,肌腱僵硬,运动范围,全身性激素浓度或心理恢复指标的间接指标的恢复。它还会干扰肌肉糖原的再合成。综上所述,根据目前可用的经验证据,主动降温对改善运动后恢复的大多数心理生理指标无效,但与被动降温相比仍可提供一些好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号