首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >A review of the diversity in taxonomy definitions scope and roles in forensic medicine: implications for evidence-based practice
【2h】

A review of the diversity in taxonomy definitions scope and roles in forensic medicine: implications for evidence-based practice

机译:分类学法医学在定义范围和作用方面的多样性综述:对循证实践的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The scope, roles, and tasks of forensic medicine and forensic medical experts currently vary widely between countries and legal systems, which has resulted in barriers to organization, standard setting, and quality assurance for practice in forensic medicine, including for reporting. The legal fact finder is thus confronted with variability in the quality, structure, and content of forensic medical reports. We sought to define and categorize the scope, methods, and practices that fall under the description of forensic medicine, the various issues encountered in current forensic medical practice, and the potential role of evidence-based practice in forensic medicine. We searched electronic databases and reviewed relevant articles, as well as conducting personal correspondences with forensic medical practitioners around the world, to obtain a description of current forensic medical practice. The terms forensic medicine, legal medicine, medical jurisprudence, medico-legal services, forensic pathology, and clinical forensic medicine are used with mixed interpretations in different countries. The systems and services rendered are not uniform either. The methods used by forensic medical practitioners are not always evidence-based, or based on standardized methods, and vary greatly between experts and centers. There are also no universally accepted guidelines to prepare a standard and admissible report. The lack of a uniform system in forensic medicine creates difficulties in assessing the development and performance of forensic medicine as a distinct discipline. To prepare evidence-based forensic medical reports, generally accepted guidelines are necessary.
机译:目前,法医和法医专家的范围,作用和任务在国家和法律体系之间存在很大差异,这导致法医(包括报告)实践的组织,标准制定和质量保证受到障碍。因此,法律事实发现者在法医报告的质量,结构和内容上都面临变化。我们试图对法医的描述,当前法医实践中遇到的各种问题以及循证实践在法医中的潜在作用进行界定和分类。我们搜索了电子数据库并查看了相关文章,并与世界各地的法医进行了私人往来,以获取对当前法医实践的描述。法医,法律医学,法学,法医学服务,法医病理学和临床法医这些术语在不同国家/地区使用混合解释。提供的系统和服务也不相同。法医从业人员使用的方法并不总是基于证据或基于标准化方法,并且专家与中心之间的差异很大。也没有普遍接受的准则来准备标准和可受理的报告。缺乏统一的法医学体系会给评估法医学作为一门独特学科的发展和绩效带来困难。要准备基于证据的法医报告,必须使用公认的准则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号