首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >When it can be good to feel bad and bad to feel good: Exploring asymmetries in workplace emotional outcomes
【2h】

When it can be good to feel bad and bad to feel good: Exploring asymmetries in workplace emotional outcomes

机译:当感觉不好和感觉不好时:探索工作场所情绪结果的不对称

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Within the field of Management and Organizational Studies, we have noted a tendency for researchers to explore symmetrical relationships between so-called positive discrete emotions or emotion-infused concepts and positive outcomes, and negative emotions or emotion-infused concepts and negative outcomes, respectively. In this Special Issue, we seek to problematize this assumption (without aiming to entirely discard it) by creating space for researchers to study what we term asymmetrical relationships. In particular, we explore the topic of when it can be good to feel bad and bad to feel good. The articles presented in this forum demonstrate both theoretically and empirically that appreciating these asymmetrical relationships holds considerable promise for enhanced understanding of a range of management and organizational phenomena, ranging from leadership and followership to emotional labor and dirty work. These unique theoretical and empirical insights have important relevance for organizational practice.
机译:在管理和组织研究领域,我们注意到研究人员倾向于探索积极的离散情绪或灌输情感的概念与积极的结果,以及消极的情绪或灌输情感的概念和负面的结果之间的对称关系。在本期特刊中,我们试图通过为研究人员创造空间来研究我们所谓的非对称关系,来对这一假设进行质疑(而不是完全放弃它)。尤其是,我们探讨了何时感到难过和感到难过的话题。在该论坛上发表的文章从理论上和经验上都表明,赞赏这些不对称的关系对于增强对一系列管理和组织现象的理解具有很大的希望,这些现象包括领导力和追随者,情感劳动和肮脏的工作。这些独特的理论和经验见解对组织实践具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号