首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >Structuralism’s Afters: Tracing Transdisciplinarity through Guattari and Latour
【2h】

Structuralism’s Afters: Tracing Transdisciplinarity through Guattari and Latour

机译:结构主义的后尘:通过瓜塔里和拉图尔追踪跨学科性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This article analyses Guattari's and Latour's bodies of work as radical developers of a processual and ontological transdisciplinarity. These works impose a definitive break from the history that, in the 1960s, had drawn upon structuralism in order to oppose philosophy with an epistemological revolution from the perspective of a scientific problematization and first transdisciplinary reconfiguration of the sciences de l'homme. It is shown that the second anti-structuralist transdisciplinarity affirms as its raison dêtre “the necessity to return to Pragmatics” (Guattari), to enact the new significance of the transversal constructions liberated by the rhizomatic monism of a hybrid social ontology (Latour). Between Guattari, Latour, and the ecologization they share, a total de-epistemologization and re-ontologization is engaged. It leads to the fall of the 'Ontological Iron Curtain' erected by the philosophical tradition between mind and matter, nature and society. The article concludes by critically addressing the final statements of both Guattari and Latour towards a new aesthetic paradigm and a new diplomacy of institutional forms respectively.
机译:本文分析了瓜塔里(Guattari)和拉图尔(Latour)作为过程和本体论跨学科性的激进发展者的工作体系。这些著作与1960年代利用结构主义以从哲学问题化和第一次科学的跨学科重构的观点出发反对认识论革命反对哲学的历史形成了鲜明的区别。研究表明,第二次反结构主义的跨学科性肯定了它的存在理由“必须重返语用学”(瓜塔里),以体现由混合社会本体论的根际一元论(Latour)解放的横向结构的新意义。在瓜塔里(Guattari),拉图尔(Latour)和他们共享的生态化之间,进行了完全去表象化和重新本体化。它导致了思想与物质,自然与社会之间的哲学传统所架设的“本体论铁幕”的衰落。本文最后通过批判性地解决了瓜塔里和拉图尔的最终声明,分别提出了新的美学范式和新的体制形式外交。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号