首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >The limits of historical sociology: Temporal borders and the reproduction of the ‘modern’ political present
【2h】

The limits of historical sociology: Temporal borders and the reproduction of the ‘modern’ political present

机译:历史社会学的局限性:时间边界和现代政治礼物的再现

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article develops a poststructuralist critique of the historical sociology of International Relations project. While the historical sociology of International Relations project claims to offer a more nuanced understanding of the state and the international, this article argues that it lacks critical reflection on the notion of a common ground on which ‘history’ and ‘sociology’ can successfully be combined. In order to problematize this ‘ground’, the article turns to Jacques Derrida’s critique of attempts to solve the history–structure dichotomy by finding a perfect combination of historicist and structuralist modes of explanation. Exploring the implications of Derrida’s critique, the article considers how the combination of ‘history’ and ‘sociology’ can be linked to a sovereign politics of time, which reaffirms rather than challenges the limits of the ‘modern’ political present and its relationship to the past, as well as the future. In response, it is suggested that a more radical critique is needed, one that seeks to disrupt the ‘modern’ political present and the contingent ground on which it rests.
机译:本文对国际关系项目的历史社会学进行了后结构主义的批判。尽管国际关系项目的历史社会学声称提供了对国家和国际的更细微的理解,但本文认为,它对能够成功地结合“历史”和“社会学”的共同基础概念缺乏批判性的思考。 。为了解决这个“基础”,本文转向雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)对试图通过发现历史主义和结构主义解释模式的完美结合来解决历史结构二分法的批评。在探讨德里达批评的含义时,本文考虑了“历史”和“社会学”的结合如何与时间的主权政治联系起来,这重申而不是挑战“现代”政治现在的局限及其与政治的关系。过去,以及未来。作为回应,有人建议,需要进行更激进的批评,以期破坏“现代”政治现状及其赖以生存的条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号