首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >Comparison of Skinfold Thicknesses and Bioimpedance Spectroscopy to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for the Body Fat Measurement in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
【2h】

Comparison of Skinfold Thicknesses and Bioimpedance Spectroscopy to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for the Body Fat Measurement in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

机译:皮肤厚度和生物阻抗谱与双能X线吸收法测定慢性肾脏病患者体内脂肪的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background/Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the amount of body fat measured by skinfold thickness (SFT) and bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a reference method. Methods: Forty-eight patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment thrice-weekly for at least 3 months (HD group) with a mean age of 59.8 ± 15.5 years, 61 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and a mean age of 60.1 ± 17.7 years (predialysis group, PreD), and 33 individuals without kidney disease with an eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and a mean age of 58.7 ± 17.0 years (control group) were included. Results: Mean percentages of body fat measured by SFT did not significantly differ from those measured by DXA in the HD group (P = .249) and the PreD group (P = .355). In the control group, mean percentage of fat mass measured by SFT was significantly higher than measured by DXA (P = .004). Mean difference was 1.99% ± 3.65%. The measurements of body fat performed by BIS were significantly higher than those performed by DXA in all studied groups (P < .001). Age was statistically significant and the strongest factor that influenced the variability of measurements obtained by BIS and DXA in all studied groups (R2 = 0.302, 0.153, and 0.250, respectively, for HD, PreD, and control groups). Conclusions: SFT as a method of fat mass assessment in daily routine practice seems to be more reliable then BIS in patients treated with hemodialysis and in patients with stage IV/V CKD. However, methods based on bioimpedance techniques can potentially offer more data such as overhydration or an amount of lean tissue mass, but further investigations are needed to establish method the most suitable for patients with CKD.
机译:背景/目的:本研究的目的是比较以双能X射线吸收法(DXA)为基础的皮褶厚度(SFT)和生物阻抗谱(BIS)测得的体内脂肪量。方法:48名每周至少三次进行血液透析治疗3个月的患者(HD组),平均年龄为59.8±15.5岁,61例慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)估计< 30 mL / min / 1.73 m 2 ,平均年龄为60.1±17.7岁(透析前组,PreD),以及33名无肾脏疾病的eGFR> 60 mL / min / 1.73 m 2 ,平均年龄为58.7±17.0岁(对照组)。结果:在HD组(P = .249)和PreD组(P = .355),通过SFT测量的平均体内脂肪百分比与DXA测量的平均百分比没有显着差异。在对照组中,通过SFT测量的平均脂肪质量百分比显着高于通过DXA测量的脂肪质量百分比(P = .004)。平均差异为1.99%±3.65%。在所有研究组中,BIS进行的体内脂肪测量均显着高于DXA进行的测量(P <.001)。在所有研究组中,年龄具有统计学意义,并且是影响BIS和DXA获得的测量结果变异性的最强因素(HD,PreD和对照组的R 2 分别为0.302、0.153和0.250。组)。结论:在血液透析治疗的患者和IV / V CKD期患者中,SFT作为一种日常脂肪量评估方法似乎比BIS更可靠。然而,基于生物阻抗技术的方法可以潜在地提供更多数据,例如水合过度或大量的瘦组织,但是需要进一步研究以建立最适合CKD患者的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号