首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >Text World Theory and real world readers: From literature to life in a Belfast prison
【2h】

Text World Theory and real world readers: From literature to life in a Belfast prison

机译:文本世界理论与现实世界的读者:从文学到贝尔法斯特监狱的生活

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Cognitive stylistics offers a range of frameworks for understanding (amongst other things) what producers of literary texts ‘do’ with language and how they ‘do’ it. Less prevalent, however, is an understanding of the ways in which these same frameworks offer insights into what readers ‘do’ (and how they ‘do’ it). Text World Theory (Werth, 1999; Gavins, 2007; Whiteley, 2011) has proved useful for understanding how and why readers construct mental representations engendered by the act of reading. However, research on readers’ responses to literature has largely focused on an ‘idealised’ reader or an ‘experimental’ subject-reader often derived from within the academy and conducted using contrived or amended literary fiction. Moreover, the format of traditional book groups (participants read texts privately and discuss them at a later date) as well as online community forums such as Goodreads, means that such studies derive data from post-hoc, rather than real-time textual encounters and discussions. The current study is the first of its kind in analysing real-time reading contexts with real readers during a researcher-led literary project (‘read.live.learn’) in Northern Ireland’s only female prison. In doing so, the study is unique in addressing experimental and post hoc bias. Using Text World Theory, the paper considers the personal and social impact of reader engagement in the talk of the participants. As such, it has three interrelated aims: to argue for the social and personal benefits of reading stylistically rich literature in real-time reading groups; to demonstrate the efficacy of stylistics for understanding how those benefits come about, and to demonstrate the inter-disciplinary value of stylistics, particularly its potential for traversing traditional research parameters.
机译:认知文体学为理解(除其他事项外)文学文本的生产者用语言“做什么”以及他们如何“使用”提供了一系列框架。然而,对这些框架对读者“做什么”(以及他们如何“做”)的见解的理解还不那么普遍。文本世界理论(Werth,1999; Gavins,2007; Whiteley,2011)被证明有助于理解读者如何以及为何构建阅读行为所产生的心理表征。但是,有关读者对文学的反应的研究主要集中在“理想化”读者或“实验性”主题读者,这些读者通常是来自学院内部并使用人为或修改的文学小说进行的。此外,传统书组的格式(参与者私下阅读文本并在以后进行讨论)以及诸如Goodreads之类的在线社区论坛,意味着此类研究是从事后而非实时的文本交流中获取数据,并且讨论。目前的研究尚属首次,它是在北爱尔兰唯一的女性监狱中,由研究人员主导的文学项目(“ read.live.learn”)中,与真正的读者一起分析实时阅读环境的。这样,这项研究在解决实验偏差和事后偏差方面是独一无二的。本文使用文本世界理论,考虑了参与者参与谈话时读者参与的个人和社会影响。因此,它具有三个相互关联的目标:为实时阅读小组中阅读风格丰富的文学作品的社会和个人利益辩护;展示文体学在理解这些收益如何产生方面的功效,并展示文体学的跨学科价值,特别是其在穿越传统研究参数方面的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号