首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >The Governmentalization of the Trade Union and the Potential of Union-Based Resistance. The Case of Undocumented Migrant Domestic Workers in the Netherlands Making Rights Claims
【2h】

The Governmentalization of the Trade Union and the Potential of Union-Based Resistance. The Case of Undocumented Migrant Domestic Workers in the Netherlands Making Rights Claims

机译:工会的政府化和基于工会的抵抗的潜力。荷兰无证移徙家庭佣工提出权利主张的案件

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Ambivalence about rights is well known: rights may both challenge existing injustices while simultaneously re-enforcing sovereign regulatory control over citizens. In this article, we focus on the paradox that potentially radical and transformative claims to rights are made at a site – civil society – that under liberal governmentality has increasingly become a site of government. By exploring the unionization of undocumented migrant domestic workers (MDWs) in the Netherlands, we aim to show how rights claims are shaped and controlled by civil society. Using the analytical category of (in)visibility, the case study discloses the dualistic role of the union. On the one hand, the union operated as a site of resistance supporting undocumented MDWs to make their rights claims. On the other hand, it operated as a site of government of the same undocumented MDWs by selectively promoting work-related rights claims and excluding more radical claims for the right to come and go.
机译:关于权利的矛盾是众所周知的:权利既可以挑战现有的不公正,同时又可以加强对公民的主权监管控制。在本文中,我们关注一个悖论,即潜在的激进的和变革性的权利主张是在一个场所-民间社会-在自由政府制下日益成为政府场所的。通过探索荷兰无证移徙家政工人(MDW)的工会化,我们旨在展示公民社会如何塑造和控制权利主张。案例研究使用(不可见性)分析类别,揭示了工会的双重角色。一方面,工会是抵抗的场所,支持无证件的MDW提出权利要求。另一方面,它通过选择性地促进与工作有关的权利主张,并排除了关于进出权利的更激进的主张,从而成为那些未记录在案的MDW的政府所在地。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号