首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >Foundations in the Netherlands: Toward a Diversified Social Model?
【2h】

Foundations in the Netherlands: Toward a Diversified Social Model?

机译:荷兰的基金会:走向多元化的社会模式?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article describes the history, development, and current position of Dutch foundations. In the past, the philanthropy sector and foundations initiated many nonprofit services in the Netherlands. Along with the growth of the welfare state, philanthropy was sidelined. Due to public funding, the pillarized Dutch nonprofit sector extended strongly. However, despite its large scale it shows a special feature. Most nonprofits are still privately governed institutions although publicly funded. In the 1980s, governmental budget cuts forced the nonprofits to embrace the market as income source. A dualistic model got dominancy or state or market. At the end of the 20th century, however, philanthropy revived and a new philanthropy sector emerged. The article addresses the issue of the role of philanthropy in changing (European) welfare states. Are we experiencing further marketization and privatization—toward a so-called Anglo-Saxon shareholder model—or are we seeing a continuation of the so-called Rhineland, multistakeholder model of government, market, and philanthropy?
机译:本文介绍了荷兰基金会的历史,发展和当前位置。过去,慈善事业和基金会在荷兰发起了许多非营利服务。随着福利国家的发展,慈善事业被淘汰。由于公共资金的支持,陷入困境的荷兰非营利部门得到了大力发展。但是,尽管规模很大,它仍具有特殊功能。尽管是由公共资助的,但大多数非营利组织仍是私人治理的机构。在1980年代,政府削减预算迫使非营利组织将市场作为收入来源。二元模型获得了支配地位,州或市场。然而,在20世纪末,慈善事业复兴了,新的慈善事业出现了。文章探讨了慈善事业在改变(欧洲)福利国家中的作用。我们是否正在经历进一步的市场化和私有化,走向所谓的盎格鲁-撒克逊股东模型,或者我们正在看到所谓的莱茵兰,政府,市场和慈善事业的多利益相关者模型的延续?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号