首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Quality in Health Care : QHC >Clinical practice guidelines in dentistry: opinions of dental practitioners on their contribution to the quality of dental care
【2h】

Clinical practice guidelines in dentistry: opinions of dental practitioners on their contribution to the quality of dental care

机译:牙科临床实践指南:牙科医生对其对牙科保健质量的贡献的意见

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives: To assess the opinions of general dental practitioners regarding the development and importance of clinical practice guidelines and their contribution to the quality of dental care. >Methods: A questionnaire was sent to a representative sample of 1656 dentists in the Netherlands. Factor analysis was conducted to identify scales of variables, and a reliability analysis was conducted to verify the reliability of the identified scales. The effect of the independent variables is expressed as odds ratio per scale part (standard deviation, SD). Regression analyses were conducted to study determinants of the opinions on clinical guidelines. >Results: The response rate was 73%; 54% of the respondents supported the development of clinical practice guidelines for dentists. Most respondents indicated that clinical practice guidelines could be used as a checklist, as a support in daily clinical decision making, and as a basis for continuing dental education. The factor analyses yielded four scale factors—contribution of guidelines to effectiveness of care (OR 1.95/SD), contribution of guidelines to professional autonomy (OR 1.70/SD), contribution of guidelines to quality of care (OR 2.52/SD), and contribution of guidelines to collaboration (OR 1.49/SD)—which complied with the criterion of Cronbach's alpha >0.60. Multiple regression analysis with the four scale factors as dependent variables yielded only extremely low correlations for practice and dentist characteristics (R2=0.01–0.04). >Conclusions: Only about 50% of dentists support the development and implementation of clinical guidelines. Guidelines are seen as helpful in the provision of continuing dental education and as a support in daily clinical decision making. The most important barrier to successful implementation of clinical practice guidelines is the fear of dental practitioners that guidelines will reduce their professional autonomy. Practice and dentist characteristics are unrelated to dentists' opinions on clinical practice guidelines.
机译:>目标:评估一般牙科医生对临床实践指南的发展和重要性及其对牙科护理质量的贡献的观点。 >方法:向荷兰的1656名牙医的代表性样本发送了问卷。进行因子分析以识别变量的规模,并进行可靠性分析以验证所识别规模的可靠性。自变量的影响表示为每刻度部分的优势比(标准偏差,SD)。进行回归分析以研究对临床指南意见的决定因素。 >结果:回复率为73%; 54%的受访者支持为牙医制定临床实践指南。大多数受访者表示,临床实践指南可以用作清单,可以作为日常临床决策的依据,也可以作为继续进行牙科教育的基础。因子分析得出四个尺度因子:指南对护理有效性的贡献(OR 1.95 / SD),指南对职业自治的贡献(OR 1.70 / SD),指南对护理质量的贡献(OR 2.52 / SD)和准则对协作的贡献(OR 1.49 / SD)-符合Cronbach alpha> 0.60的标准。以四个比例因子为因变量的多元回归分析与实践和牙医特征的相关性极低(R 2 = 0.01–0.04)。 >结论:只有大约50%的牙医支持临床指南的制定和实施。指南被认为有助于提供持续的牙科教育,并为日常临床决策提供支持。成功实施临床实践指南的最重要障碍是牙科医生担心指南会降低其专业自主性。执业和牙医特征与牙医对临床执业指南的看法无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号