【2h】

What is a prescribing error?

机译:什么是处方错误?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

> N Barber, professor of the practice of pharmacy > M Schachter, senior lecturer and honorary consultant physician Objective—To develop a practitioner led definition of a prescribing error for use in quantitative studies of their incidence. Design—Two stage Delphi technique. Subjects—A panel of 34 UK judges, which included physicians, surgeons, pharmacists, nurses and risk managers. Main outcome measures—The extent to which judges agreed with a general definition of a prescribing error, and the extent to which they agreed that each of 42 scenarios represented a prescribing error. Results—Responses were obtained from 30 (88%) of 34 judges in the first Delphi round, and from 26 (87%) of 30 in the second round. The general definition of a prescribing error was accepted. The panel reached consensus that 24 of the 42 scenarios should be included as prescribing errors and that five should be excluded. In general, transcription errors, failure to communicate essential information, and the use of drugs or doses inappropriate for the individual patient were considered prescribing errors; deviations from policies or guidelines were not. Conclusions—Health care professionals are in broad agreement about the types of events that should be included and excluded as prescribing errors. A general definition of a prescribing error has been developed, together with more detailed guidance regarding the types of events that should be included. This definition allows the comparison of prescribing error rates among different prescribing systems and different hospitals, and is suitable for use in both research and clinical governance initiatives. (Quality in Health Care 2000;>9:232–237) >Key Words: prescribing errors; medication errors; definition of error
机译:> N Barber,药学实践教授<​​/ strong> > M Schachter,高级讲师兼名誉顾问医师目的-建立由医师主导的处方错误定义,以用于对药物的定量研究他们的发病率。设计-两阶段Delphi技术。主题-由34位英国法官组成的小组,其中包括医师,外科医生,药剂师,护士和风险管理人员。主要结果度量-法官对处方错误的一般定义的认同程度,以及他们同意42种情况中的每种代表处方错误的程度。结果-在第一轮Delphi中,从34名法官中的30名(88%)获得了答复,在第二轮中30名中的26名(87%)获得了答复。处方错误的一般定义被接受。专家组达成共识,应将42种方案中的24种作为规定的错误,而应排除五种。通常,转录错误,无法传达基本信息以及对个别患者使用不适当的药物或剂量被视为处方错误;没有违反政策或准则。结论—医护专业人员对于应作为处方错误包括和排除的事件类型达成广泛共识。已经制定了处方错误的一般定义,以及有关应包括的事件类型的更详细的指导。此定义允许比较不同处方系统和不同医院之间的处方错误率,并且适用于研究和临床治理计划。 (Quality in Health Care 2000; > 9 :232–237)>关键字:规定了错误;用药错误;错误的定义

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号