首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Quality in Health Care : QHC >Can small group education and peer review improve care for patients with asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?
【2h】

Can small group education and peer review improve care for patients with asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

机译:小团体教育和同行评审是否可以改善哮喘/慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的护理?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness of an intensive small group education and peer review programme aimed at implementing national guidelines on asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on care provision by general practitioners (GPs) and on patient outcomes. DESIGN: A randomised experimental study with pre-measurement and post- measurement (after one year) in an experimental group and a control group in Dutch general practice. SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTION: Two groups of GPs were formed and randomised. The education and peer review group (17 GPs with 210 patients) had an intervention consisting of an interactive group education and peer review programme (four sessions each lasting two hours). The control group consisted of 17 GPs with 223 patients (no intervention). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Knowledge, skills, opinion about asthma and COPD care, presence of equipment in practice; actual performance about peakflow measurement, non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment; asthma symptoms (Dutch Medical Research Council), smoking habits, exacerbation ratio, and disease specific quality of life (QOL-RIQ). Data were collected by a written questionnaire for GPs, by self recording of consultations by GPs, and by a written self administered questionnaire for adult patients with asthma/COPD. RESULTS: Data from 34 GP questionnaires, 433 patient questionnaires, and recordings from 934 consultations/visits and 350 repeat prescriptions were available. Compared with the control group there were only significant changes for self estimated skills (+16%, 95% confidence interval 4% to 26%) and presence of peakflow meters in practice (+18%, p < 0.05). No significant changes were found for provided care and patient outcomes compared with the control group. In the subgroup of more severe patients, the group of older patients, and in the group of patients not using anti-inflammatory medication at baseline, no significant changes compared with the control group were seen in patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: Except for two aspects, intensive small group education and peer review in asthma and COPD care do not seem to be effective in changing relevant aspects of the provided care by GPs in accordance with guidelines, nor in changing patients' health status.
机译:目的:研究强化的小组教育和同行评审计划的有效性,该计划旨在实施关于哮喘/慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的国家指南,以指导全科医生(GP)提供护理和患者预后。设计:一项随机实验研究,在荷兰普通实践中,在实验组和对照组中进行了测量前和测量后(一年后)。受试者和干预:两组全科医生组成并随机分组。教育和同行评议小组(17位全科医生共210名患者)进行了干预,其中包括互动式小组教育和同行评议计划(四节课,每次持续两个小时)。对照组由17名全科医生组成,有223名患者(无干预)。主要观察指标:知识,技能,对哮喘和COPD护理的看法,实践中使用的设备;峰值流量测量,非药物和药物治疗的实际表现;哮喘症状(荷兰医学研究理事会),吸烟习惯,病情恶化率和特定疾病的生活质量(QOL-RIQ)。数据以书面形式收集GP的问卷,通过GP自行记录的咨询记录以及成年人自我书面问卷哮喘/ COPD。结果:来自34名GP问卷的数据,共433名患者934次咨询/访问和350次重复的问卷调查和记录处方可用。与对照组相比,有自我估计技能只有重大变化(+ 16%,95%置信度间隔为4%到26%)和实际中存在峰值流量计(+ 18%,p<0.05)。所提供的护理和患者未发现明显变化结果与对照组相比。在更严重的亚组中患者,老年患者组和非患者组在基线使用消炎药,无明显变化与对照组相比,患者预后良好。结论:除了两个方面,密集的小组教育和同行评议哮喘和COPD护理似乎并不能有效改变相关疾病全科医生按照指南提供的护理方面,或改变患者的健康状况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号