首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >Cancer incidences in Europe related to mortalities, and ethnohistoric, genetic, and geographic distances
【2h】

Cancer incidences in Europe related to mortalities, and ethnohistoric, genetic, and geographic distances

机译:欧洲的癌症发病率与死亡率,民族历史,遗传和地理距离有关

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We have previously shown that geographic differences in cancer mortalities in Europe are related to (in order of importance): geographic distances (reflecting environmental differences), ethnohistoric distances (encompassing cultural and genetic attributes), and genetic distances of the populations in the areas studied. In this study, we analyzed the relations of the same three factors to European incidences of 45 male and 47 female cancers. Differences in cancer incidences are correlated moderately, first with geographic distances, and then with genetic distances, but not at all with ethnohistoric distances. Comparing these findings to the earlier ones for cancer mortalities, we note the reversal in the importance of ethnohistory and genetics, and the generally lower correlations of incidence differences with the three putatively causal distance matrices. A path diagram combining both studies demonstrates the lack of cultural carcinogenic effects, but suggests cultural influences on procedures such as the registration of deaths in different political entities. Additionally, the relatively large correlation between ethnohistoric distances and mortality differences is caused by common factors behind the correlation of ethnohistoric and geographic distances. Geographic proximity results in similar ethnohistories. The direct effects of genetic distances are negligible and only their common effects with geographic distances play a role, accounting for the weak to negligible influence of genetics on incidence and mortality differences. Apparently, the genetic systems available to us do not substantially affect cancer incidence or mortality. We present indirect evidence that international differences in the quality of cancer rate data are greater in mortalities than in incidences.
机译:先前我们已经证明,欧洲癌症死亡率的地理差异与(按重要性顺序)有关:地理距离(反映环境差异),民族历史距离(包括文化和遗传属性)以及所研究地区人口的遗传距离。在这项研究中,我们分析了这三个因素与欧洲45例男性和47例女性癌症发病率之间的关系。癌症发病率的差异具有中等程度的相关性,首先与地理距离相关,然后与遗传距离相关,而与民族历史距离完全无关。将这些发现与较早的癌症死亡率进行比较,我们注意到种族史和遗传学重要性的逆转,以及与三种假定因果距离矩阵之间发病率差异的相关性通常较低。结合这两项研究的路径图证明了缺乏文化致癌作用,但暗示了文化对程序的影响,例如不同政治实体中的死亡登记。另外,民族历史距离与死亡率差异之间的相对较大的相关性是由民族历史和地理距离的相关性背后的共同因素引起的。地理位置接近导致相似的民族史。遗传距离的直接影响可以忽略不计,只有它们与地理距离的共同影响才起作用,这说明了遗传因素对发病率和死亡率差异的影响微弱至可以忽略。显然,我们可以利用的遗传系统并没有实质性地影响癌症的发病率或死亡率。我们提供了间接证据,表明死亡率数据上国际差异的死亡率高于发病率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号