首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Patency rates of arteriovenous fistulas created before versus after hemodialysis initiation
【2h】

Patency rates of arteriovenous fistulas created before versus after hemodialysis initiation

机译:开始血液透析前后对比动静脉瘘的通畅率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In an incident hemodialysis (HD) population, we aimed to investigate whether arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation before HD initiation was associated with improved AVF patency compared with AVF creation from a central venous catheter (CVC), and also to compare patient survival between these patients. Between January 2011 and December 2013, 524 incident HD patients with identified first predialysis vascular access with an AVF (pre-HD group, n = 191) or an AVF from a CVC (on-HD group, n = 333) were included and analyzed retrospectively. The study outcome was defined as AVF patency and all-cause mortality (time to death). On Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, primary and secondary AVF patency rates did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.812 and P = 0.586, respectively), although the overall survival rate was significantly higher in the pre-HD group compared with the on-HD group (P = 0.013). On multivariate analysis, well-known patient factors were associated with decreased primary (older age and diabetes mellitus [DM]) and secondary (DM and peripheral arterial occlusive disease) AVF patency, whereas use of a CVC as the initial predialysis access (hazard ratios, 1.84; 95% confidence intervals, 1.20–2.75; P = 0.005) was significantly associated with worse survival in addition to well-known patient factors (older age, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral arterial occlusive disease). Worse survival in the on-HD group was likely confounded by selection bias because of the retrospective nature of our study. Therefore, the observed lower mortality associated with AVF creation before HD initiation is not fully attributable to CVC use, but rather, affected by other patient-level prognostic factors. There were no CVC-related complications in the pre-HD group, whereas 10.2% of CVC-related complications were noted in the on-HD group. In conclusion, among incident HD patients, compared with patients who underwent creation of an AVF from a CVC, initial AVF creation showed similar primary and secondary AVF patency rates, but lower mortality risk. We also observed that an initial CVC use was an independent risk factor associated with worse survival. A fistula-first strategy might be the best option for incident HD patients who are good candidates for AVF creation.
机译:在事件性血液透析(HD)人群中,我们旨在调查与从中央静脉导管(CVC)创建AVF相比,在HD启动之前动静脉瘘(AVF)的产生是否与改善的AVF通畅性相关,并比较这两者之间的患者存活率耐心。在2011年1月至2013年12月之间,纳入并分析了524例经确诊的首次透析前有AVF的HD患者(HD前组,n = 191)或来自CVC的AVF(HD组,n = 333)。追溯地。研究结果定义为AVF通畅和全因死亡率(死亡时间)。在Kaplan–Meier生存分析中,两组之间的原发性和继发性AVF通畅率无显着差异(分别为P = 0.812和P = 0.586),尽管HD前组的总体生存率明显高于HD组。 HD组(P = 0.013)。在多变量分析中,众所周知的患者因素与原发性(老年和糖尿病[DM])和继发性(DM和周围动脉闭塞性疾病)AVF减少相关,而使用CVC作为初始透析前途径(危险比) ,1.84; 95%置信区间1.20-2.75; P = 0.005与除患者已知的因素(高龄,糖尿病和周围动脉闭塞性疾病)外生存率显着降低相关。由于我们的研究具有回顾性,因此高清人群中较差的生存率可能会因选择偏误而混淆。因此,观察到的与HD开始之前AVF产生相关的更低的死亡率并不完全归因于CVC的使用,而是受到其他患者水平的预后因素的影响。 HD前组没有CVC相关的并发症,而HD前组中有10.2%的CVC相关并发症。总之,与接受CVC创建AVF的患者相比,发生HD的患者中,最初的AVF创建显示出相似的原发性和继发性AVF通畅率,但死亡率降低。我们还观察到,最初使用CVC是与生存不良相关的独立危险因素。瘘管优先策略可能是对于AVF创造的良好候选HD患者的最佳选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号