首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with Streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis
【2h】

Efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with Streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis

机译:头孢喹酮和氯沙西林和氨苄西林联合治疗奶牛无乳链球菌亚临床乳腺炎的疗效

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A randomized clinical trial was conducted to assess efficacy of intramammary cloxacillin and ampicillin (CLOXIMM), intramammary cefquinome (CEFIMM), and intramuscular cefquinome (CEFIM) to treat Streptococcus agalactiae intramammary infections (Trial 1). Subsequently, two treatment groups were extended to assess whether CLOXIMM was not inferior to CEFIMM (Trial 2). Nine farms were included in the study. Milk samples were collected from all quarters of all lactating cows for microbiological identification of S. agalactiae. Positive cows were randomly allocated into four groups: CLOXIMM, CEFIMM, CEFIM, or negative control (CONTROL). Study outcomes were bacteriological cure at 14 (CURE14), 21 (CURE21), and 14 and 21 (CURE1421) days after treatment onset, and somatic cell count. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of cure between each treatment and CONTROL. Non-inferiority analysis was performed considering a one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) and non-inferiority margins (Δ) of 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, and 0.25. Adjusted S. agalactiae bacteriological cure for CLOXIMM, CEFIMM, CEFIM, and CONTROL was 86, 98, 55, and 25% at day 14; 82, 93, 52, and 0% at day 21; and 82, 92, 40, and 0% at days 14 and 21, respectively. Treatment with CLOXIMM and CEFIMM resulted in greater bacteriological cure rates, as compared with CEFIM or CONTROL, which does not justify the use of CEFIM in S. agalactiae eradication programs. The CURE14 difference between CEFIMM and CLOXIMM was of 12.1 percentage points (95% CI: 0.056–0.184). CLOXIMM was considered not inferior to CEFIMM for Δ = 0.20 or 0.25 and inconclusive for Δ = 0.10 or 0.15. Thus, it should be pondered by veterinarians whether an expected 12.1 (5.6–18.4) percentage points increase in cure rate would justify the use of a fourth-generation cephalosporin, as opposed to a combination of traditional IMM drugs (cloxacillin and ampicillin) to treat S. agalactiae subclinical mastitis.
机译:进行了一项随机临床试验,以评估乳内氯沙西林和氨苄西林( CLOXIMM ),乳内头孢喹酮( CEFIMM )和肌内头孢喹喹( CEFIM )以治疗无乳链球菌的乳房内感染(试验1)。随后,扩大了两个治疗组以评估CLOXIMM是否不逊于CEFIMM(试验2)。该研究包括九个农场。从所有泌乳母牛的所有四分之一处收集牛奶样品,以微生物鉴定无乳链球菌。将阳性母牛随机分为四组:CLOXIMM,CEFIMM,CEFIM或阴性对照( CONTROL )。研究结果是治疗开始后第14天( CURE14 ),第21天( CURE21 ),第14天和第21天( CURE1421 )的细菌治愈,以及体细胞计数。使用逻辑回归来估计每种疗法与对照之间治愈的几率。考虑单侧95%置信区间( CI )和非劣质性余量(Δ)为0.10、0.15、0.20和0.25进行非劣质性分析。在第14天,对CLOXIMM,CEFIMM,CEFIM和CONTROL的调整后的无乳链球菌细菌治愈率为86%,98%,55%和25%;第21天时分别为82、93、52和0%;第14天和第21天分别为82%,92%,40%和0%。与CEFIM或CONTROL相比,用CLOXIMM和CEFIMM进行治疗可提高细菌治愈率,这不能证明在消灭无乳链球菌方案中使用CEFIM是合理的。 CEFIMM和CLOXIMM之间的CURE14差异为12.1个百分点(95%CI:0.056-0.184)。对于Δ= 0.20或0.25,CLOXIMM被认为不逊于CEFIMM,而对于Δ= 0.10或0.15,CLOXIMM并没有结论。因此,兽医应考虑,治愈率预期提高12.1(5.6-18.4)个百分点是否可以证明使用第四代头孢菌素是合理的,而不是使用传统IMM药物(氯沙西林和氨苄西林)的组合治疗无乳链球菌亚临床乳腺炎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号