首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >In-season internal and external training load quantification of an elite European soccer team
【2h】

In-season internal and external training load quantification of an elite European soccer team

机译:欧洲一支精英足球队的赛季内外训练负荷量化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Elite soccer teams that participate in European competitions need to have players in the best physical and psychological status possible to play matches. As a consequence of congestive schedule, controlling the training load (TL) and thus the level of effort and fatigue of players to reach higher performances during the matches is therefore critical. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to provide the first report of seasonal internal and external training load that included Hooper Index (HI) scores in elite soccer players during an in-season period. Nineteen elite soccer players were sampled, using global position system to collect total distance, high-speed distance (HSD) and average speed (AvS). It was also collected session rating of perceived exertion (s-RPE) and HI scores during the daily training sessions throughout the 2015–2016 in-season period. Data were analysed across ten mesocycles (M: 1 to 10) and collected according to the number of days prior to a one-match week. Total daily distance covered was higher at the start (M1 and M3) compared to the final mesocycle (M10) of the season. M1 (5589m) reached a greater distance than M5 (4473m) (ES = 9.33 [12.70, 5.95]) and M10 (4545m) (ES = 9.84 [13.39, 6.29]). M3 (5691m) reached a greater distance than M5 (ES = 9.07 [12.36, 5.78]), M7 (ES = 6.13 [8.48, 3.79]) and M10 (ES = 9.37 [12.76, 5.98]). High-speed running distance was greater in M1 (227m), than M5 (92m) (ES = 27.95 [37.68, 18.22]) and M10 (138m) (ES = 8.46 [11.55, 5.37]). Interestingly, the s-RPE response was higher in M1 (331au) in comparison to the last mesocycle (M10, 239au). HI showed minor variations across mesocycles and in days prior to the match. Every day prior to a match, all internal and external TL variables expressed significant lower values to other days prior to a match (p<0.01). In general, there were no differences between player positions.Conclusions: Our results reveal that despite the existence of some significant differences between mesocycles, there were minor changes across the in-season period for the internal and external TL variables used. Furthermore, it was observed that MD-1 presented a reduction of external TL (regardless of mesocycle) while internal TL variables did not have the same record during in-season match-day-minus.
机译:参加欧洲比赛的优秀足球队需要让运动员处于最好的身体和心理状态,才能参加比赛。因此,由于赛程很拥挤,因此控制训练负荷(TL)从而控制运动员的努力水平和疲劳程度在比赛中达到更高的表现至关重要。因此,本研究的目的是提供有关季节内外部训练负荷的第一份报告,其中包括精英足球运动员的胡珀指数(HI)得分。使用全球定位系统对19名精英足球运动员进行了采样,以收集总距离,高速距离(HSD)和平均速度(AvS)。还收集了整个2015-2016赛季期间的日常训练期间的感知劳累(s-RPE)和HI分数的课程等级。分析了十个中周期(M:1至10)的数据,并根据一周一轮比赛前的天数进行了收集。与季节的最后一个中周期(M10)相比,开始时的每日总距离(M1和M3)更高。 M1(5589m)到达的距离比M5(4473m)(ES = 9.33 [12.70,5.95])和M10(4545m)(ES = 9.84 [13.39,6.29])大。 M3(5691m)的距离比M5(ES = 9.07 [12.36,5.78]),M7(ES = 6.13 [8.48,3.79])和M10(ES = 9.37 [12.76,5.98])更大。 M1(227m)的高速行驶距离大于M5(92m)(ES = 27.95 [37.68,18.22])和M10(138m)(ES = 8.46 [11.55,5.37])。有趣的是,与上一个中周期(M10,239au)相比,M1(331au)中的s-RPE反应更高。 HI在整个比赛周期和比赛开始前几天表现出较小的变化。比赛开始前的每一天,所有内部和外部TL变量均比比赛开始前的其他几天均显着降低(p <0.01)。一般而言,玩家位置之间没有差异。结论:我们的结果表明,尽管中周期之间存在一些显着差异,但使用的内部和外部TL变量在整个季节期间都存在较小的变化。此外,据观察,MD-1减少了外部TL(无论中间周期如何),而内部TL变量在季节比赛日减负期间没有相同的记录。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号