首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Wild pollinator activity negatively related to honey bee colony densities in urban context
【2h】

Wild pollinator activity negatively related to honey bee colony densities in urban context

机译:在城市环境中,野生传粉媒介活动与蜜蜂种群密度负相关

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As pollinator decline is increasingly reported in natural and agricultural environments, cities are perceived as shelters for pollinators because of low pesticide exposure and high floral diversity throughout the year. This has led to the development of environmental policies supporting pollinators in urban areas. However, policies are often restricted to the promotion of honey bee colony installations, which resulted in a strong increase in apiary numbers in cities. Recently, competition for floral resources between wild pollinators and honey bees has been highlighted in semi-natural contexts, but whether urban beekeeping could impact wild pollinators remains unknown. Here, we show that in the city of Paris (France), wild pollinator visitation rates are negatively correlated to honey bee colony densities present in the surrounding landscape (500m –slope = -0.614; p = 0.001 –and 1000m –slope = -0.489; p = 0.005). Regarding the morphological groups of wild pollinators, large solitary bee and beetle visitation rates were negatively affected by honey bee colony densities within a 500m buffer (slope = -0.425, p = 0.007 and slope = - 0.671, p = 0.002, respectively) and bumblebee visitation rates were negatively affected by honey bee colony density within a 1000m buffer (slope = - 0.451, p = 0.012). Further, lower interaction evenness in plant-pollinator networks was observed with high honey bee colony density within a 1000m buffer (slope = -0.487, p = 0.008). Finally, honey bees tended to focus their foraging activity on managed rather than wild plant species (student t-test, p = 0.001) whereas wild pollinators equally visited managed and wild species. We advocate responsible practices mitigating the introduction of high density of honey bee colonies in urban environments. Further studies are however needed to deepen our knowledge about the potential negative interactions between wild and domesticated pollinators.
机译:随着在自然和农业环境中传粉媒介数量下降的报道越来越多,由于全年低农药暴露和高花卉多样性,城市被认为是传粉媒介的庇护所。这导致制定了支持城市授粉媒介的环境政策。但是,政策通常仅限于推广蜜蜂殖民地设施,这导致城市的养蜂场数量大幅增加。近来,在半自然背景下,野生授粉者与蜜蜂之间争夺花卉资源的竞争日益突出,但城市养蜂是否会影响野生授粉者尚不清楚。在这里,我们表明,在法国巴黎市,野生传粉媒介的探访率与周围景观中的蜜蜂种群密度呈负相关(500m –坡度= -0.614; p = 0.001 –和1000m –坡度= -0.489 ; p = 0.005)。关于野生传粉媒介的形态群,在500m缓冲区(分别为坡度= -0.425,p = 0.007和坡度=-0.671,p = 0.002)和大黄蜂中,大的单居蜜蜂和甲虫探访率受到蜜蜂群体密度的负面影响。在1000m缓冲区内,蜜蜂的蜂群密度对访视率有负面影响(坡度=-0.451,p = 0.012)。此外,在1000m缓冲液中高蜂群密度下观察到的植物传粉媒介网络中的相互作用均匀度较低(坡度= -0.487,p = 0.008)。最后,蜜蜂倾向于将觅食活动集中在管理的物种而不是野生的植物上(学生t检验,p = 0.001),而野生传粉媒介则平均访问了管理的物种和野生物种。我们提倡负责任的做法,以减少在城市环境中引入高密度蜂群的情况。但是,需要进一步的研究来加深我们对野生和驯化授粉媒介之间潜在的负面相互作用的认识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号