首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: Two studies on the Profile of Mood States questionnaire
【2h】

Factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: Two studies on the Profile of Mood States questionnaire

机译:时间框架内的情绪因素结构和测量环境:情绪状态概况问卷的两项研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper presents the results of two studies on the invariance of the Profile of Mood States questionnaire across response time frames and circumstances of administration. We applied Spanish versions of the instrument to gather data from 1146 athletes. In the first study (N = 700), we tested the factor structure of the questionnaire in training sessions by using two different time frames: ‘right now’ (n = 350) and ‘past week’ (n = 350). In the second study (N = 446), we compared the factor structure of the questionnaire with data collected using the instruction ‘right now’ at two different circumstances: ‘training’ (n = 223) and ‘competition’ (n = 223). Data analysis was similar in both studies. We conducted multi-group confirmatory factor analyses and applied the scaled difference chi-square statistic to examine whether discrepancies in successive constrained models were significant. We observed configural equivalence between the two time frames. Furthermore, we observed metric equivalence but not scalar invariance between the different circumstances of measurement. The findings highlight the need for studies of equivalence before using a single self-report with more than one set of instructions, or under diverse circumstances. Invariance of mood scores should be examined and taken into account when interpreting individual and group mood state assessments.
机译:本文介绍了两项关于情绪状态概况问卷在响应时间框架和给药情况下的不变性的两项研究的结果。我们使用了西班牙文版的乐器来收集1146名运动员的数据。在第一项研究(N = 700)中,我们使用两个不同的时间范围(“现在”(n = 350)和“过去一周”(n = 350))在培训课程中测试了问卷的因素结构。在第二项研究(N = 446)中,我们将问卷的因素结构与使用“立即”指令在两种不同情况下收集的数据进行了比较:“培训”(n = 223)和“竞争”(n = 223) 。两项研究中的数据分析相似。我们进行了多组验证性因素分析,并应用了比例差异卡方统计量来检验连续约束模型中的差异是否显着。我们观察到两个时间框架之间的结构等效性。此外,我们观察到在不同的测量环境之间度量相等,但没有标量不变。这些发现强调了在使用具有多个指令集的单个自我报告之前或在不同情况下进行等效性研究的必要性。解释个人和团体情绪状态评估时,应检查并考虑情绪评分的不变性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号