首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >A meta-analysis of home range studies in the context of trophic levels: Implications for policy-based conservation
【2h】

A meta-analysis of home range studies in the context of trophic levels: Implications for policy-based conservation

机译:营养水平下家庭范围研究的荟萃分析:对基于政策的保护的启示

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Home ranges have been widely-used as ecological tools, though using home range estimates in decision-support for conservation biology is a relatively new idea. However, trophic levels are rarely taken into consideration when estimating home range. This lapse could present issues when interpreting past studies, especially in policy-based conservation. The objectives of this study were to survey the current literature, to critically analyse published articles with home range analyses, and to compare home range size by species’ trophic level. We predicted that animals residing in higher trophic levels would have significantly larger home ranges than animals occupying lower trophic levels. We found that terrestrial carnivores had larger home ranges than terrestrial herbivores, though terrestrial mesocarnivores had the largest home ranges. We also found that aquatic herbivores had larger home ranges than both aquatic carnivores and aquatic mesocarnivores. Our results are important to consider for planning and management sectors, to avoid the implementation of ineffective conservation policies.
机译:尽管在保护生物学的决策支持中使用家庭范围估计值是一个相对较新的想法,但家庭范围已被广泛用作生态工具。但是,在估计本垒范围时,很少考虑营养级别。在解释过去的研究时,尤其是在基于政策的保护中,这种失误可能会带来问题。这项研究的目的是调查当前文献,使用范围分析对发表的文章进行批判性分析,并根据物种的营养水平比较范围的大小。我们预测,与处于较低营养水平的动物相比,处于较高营养水平的动物将具有更大的归巢范围。我们发现,陆生食肉动物比陆生食草动物具有更大的范围,尽管陆生中食肉动物具有最大的范围。我们还发现,水生食草动物的居所范围比水生食肉动物和水生中食肉食动物都大。为了避免执行无效的保护政策,我们的结果对于规划和管理部门而言非常重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号