首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Intrarater and interrater reliability of three classifications for scapular dyskinesis in athletes
【2h】

Intrarater and interrater reliability of three classifications for scapular dyskinesis in athletes

机译:运动员肩cap运动障碍的三种分类法的内部和内部可靠性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Clinical evaluation of scapular dyskinesis (SD) aims to identify abnormal scapulothoracic movement, underlying causal factors, and the potential relationship with shoulder symptoms. The literature proposes different methods of dynamic clinical evaluation of SD, but improved reliability and agreement values are needed. The present study aimed to evaluate the intrarater and interrater agreement and reliability of three SD classifications: 1) 4-type classification, 2) Yes/No classification, and 3) scapular dyskinesis test (SDT). Seventy-five young athletes, including 45 men and 30 women, were evaluated. Raters evaluated the SD based on the three methods during one series of 8–10 cycles (at least eight and maximum of ten) of forward flexion and abduction with an external load under the observation of two raters trained to diagnose SD. The evaluation protocol was repeated after 3 h for intrarater analysis. The agreement percentage was calculated by dividing the observed agreement by the total number of observations. Reliability was calculated using Cohen Kappa coefficient, with a 95% confidence interval (CI), defined by Kappa coefficient ±1.96 multiplied by the measurement standard error. The interrater analyses showed an agreement percentage between 80% and 95.9% and an almost perfect reliability (k>0.81) for the three classification methods in all the test conditions, except the 4-type and SDT classification methods, which had substantial reliability (k<0.80) in shoulder abduction. Intrarater analyses showed agreement percentages between 80.7% and 89.3% and substantial reliability (0.67 to 0.81) for both raters in the three classifications. CIs ranged from moderate to almost perfect categories. This indicates that the three SD classification methods investigated in this study showed high reliability values for both intrarater and interrater evaluation throughout a protocol that provided SD evaluation training of raters and included several repetitions of arm movements with external load during a live assessment.
机译:肩cap运动障碍(SD)的临床评估旨在确定肩or动脉运动异常,潜在的病因以及与肩部症状的潜在关系。文献提出了不同的SD动态临床评估方法,但是需要提高可靠性和一致性值。本研究旨在评估三种SD分类的评分者之间的内在一致性和可靠性:1)4型分类,2)是/否分类和3)肩cap运动障碍试验(SDT)。对75名年轻运动员(包括45名男性和30名女性)进行了评估。在两个经过训练以诊断SD的评估者的观察下,评估者根据这三种方法在一系列的8-10个周期(至少八个,最多十个)的前屈和外展作用下,用外部方法评估了SD。 3小时后重复评估方案以进行内部评估者分析。协议百分比是通过将观察到的协议除以观察总数得出的。使用Cohen Kappa系数(具有95%的置信区间(CI))计算可靠性,该系数由Kappa系数±1.96乘以测量标准误差定义。差异分析表明,在所有测试条件下,除了4型和SDT分类方法具有显着可靠性(k)以外,三种测试方法在所有测试条件下的一致性百分比都在80%至95.9%之间,并且具有几乎完美的可靠性(k> 0.81)。 <0.80)。评估者内部分析显示,在三个分类中,两个评估者的协议百分比在80.7%至89.3%之间,并且具有较高的可靠性(0.67至0.81)。 CI的范围从中等到几乎完美。这表明,本研究中研究的三种SD分类方法在整个方案中显示了评估者内和间位评估的高可靠性值,该协议为评估者提供了SD评估培训,并且在现场评估期间多次重复手臂运动与外部负荷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号