首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Beyond group engagement: Multiple pathways from encounters with the police to cooperation and compliance in Northern Ireland
【2h】

Beyond group engagement: Multiple pathways from encounters with the police to cooperation and compliance in Northern Ireland

机译:超越团体参与:从与警察接触到北爱尔兰合作与合规的多种途径

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In a sample of young people in Northern Ireland (N = 819), we examine the relationships between the quality of experience with police officers and police legitimacy. We examine potential pathways through which experiences may either support or undermine the legitimacy of the police, and thus cooperation and compliance with them. We find evidence that perceptions of the police as having goals that align with those of wider society, and as being fair in general, mediate relations between the quality of encounters and legitimacy, which in turn mediates the relation with cooperation and compliance. Identification with wider society was not a reliable mediator, contrary to our predictions based on the Group Engagement Model. Moreover, our analysis of the structure of police fairness perceptions finds no support for the distinction between procedural and distributive police fairness as usually conceived. Implications for the social psychological understanding of legitimate authority are discussed.
机译:在北爱尔兰的一个年轻人样本中(N = 819),我们研究了警官的体验质量与警察合法性之间的关系。我们研究了经验可能支持或破坏警察合法性的潜在途径,以及由此而进行的合作与遵守。我们发现有证据表明,对警察的目标具有与更广泛的社会目标相一致的目标,并且总体上讲是公平的,因此可以调解相遇质量和合法性之间的关系,进而可以调解与合作与合规性之间的关系。与我们基于群体参与模型的预测相反,与更广泛的社会认同并不是可靠的中介。此外,我们对警察公平知觉结构的分析没有支持通常所设想的程序性和分配性警察公平之间的区别。讨论了对合法权限的社会心理理解的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号